Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bglibs"
* Package name : bglibs
Version : 2.03+dfsg-2
Upstream Author : Bruce Guenter
* Url : http://untroubled.org/bglibs/
* Licenses : GPL-2+,LGPL-
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cvm"
* Package name : cvm
Version : 0.97
Upstream Author : Bruce Guenter
* Url : http://untroubled.org/cvm/
* Licenses : LGPL-2+,GPL-2+,LGPL-2.1+
P
Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:38:16 -0700
with message-id <20170218033815.hmsv34yddtk7d...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#855202: RFS: binaryornot/0.4.0+dfsg-0.1 [RC][NMU] --
check if a file is binary or text
has caused the Debian Bug report #855202,
regarding RFS: binaryo
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> You need to submit the nmudiff to #854851.
Followed your advice.
Please kindly helpt to sponsor. Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:50:21 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> side note: the reproducible patch might be changed in something little
> different
> -const char nasm_date[] = __DATE__;
> +const char nasm_date[] = __DATE_DEBIAN__;
It is far better to just remove build dates, they are very
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:31:15PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:01:55AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Secondly, you should revert the compat change in order to be sure of
> > getting a freeze exception for the fix of the important bug.
> Too late, as the previous w
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:01:55AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Secondly, you should revert the compat change in order to be sure of
> getting a freeze exception for the fix of the important bug.
Too late, as the previous wxmaxima upload was done after the freeze.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Des
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:57:54AM +0100, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
> * Resolved an incompatibility with the gcl debian is currently shipped
> with.
> (closes: bug#853787)
> * debian/compat: Updated the standards version to 10.
Firstly, this te
Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:55:34 -0700
with message-id <20170217165534.hl4lpwoyiyo5g...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#855101: RFS: bcron/0.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #855101,
regarding RFS: bcron/0.11-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:49:11PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binaryornot" as [RC][NMU].
You need to submit the nmudiff to #854851.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> The Vcs-* links are removed since the debian directory is not included in the
> official repo.
I guess you misunderstand Sean's words.
There're two types of Vcs:
- upstream Vcs, which should not contain debian/ folder. (but if it
contains
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> Dear Gard,
>>
>> I cannot sponsor the upload. But here's my review that I hope it's helpful.
>
> Dear Roger,
>
> Thank you very much for your helpful feedback. I believe I hav
control: owner -1 j...@debian.org
>Feel free to contact me for sponsorship as I'm an alot user and
>also>fixed/filed a couple of bugs together with upstream. I'm thus very
>interested
>in keeping this package in Debian.
well, I leave you the sponsoring then :D
thanks!
G.
Hi Jordan,
Quoting Gianfranco Costamagna (2017-02-17 11:11:35)
> >I do have reservations about moving the package from the PAPT umbrella into
> >collab-maint, but it's not my call anymore.
>
>
> lets review:
> a) PAPT seems more appropriate
> b) "alot (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium"
> this
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Simon Chopin wrote:
>
> to review anyone's work. As far as uploading goes, I'm fairly sure my GPG
> key has expired.
FYI. if your key hasn't been compromised, it's easy to extend the
expiration date [0].
[0]
https://riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpg
On 2017-02-16 23:59:07, Simon Chopin wrote:
> I do have reservations about moving the package from the PAPT umbrella into
> collab-maint, but it's not my call anymore.
I'm sorry. I meant to say that I planned to put it into git under the
PAPT, not collab-maint. So, the change would be moving from
Hi
>Jordan contacted me a few days ago, I gave him complete
>permission to adopt the package, as I've been for all intent and
>purposes, fallen MIA
thanks!
>While I am a DM, I haven't been
>active in the Debian community for something like two years (nor have I
>been using Debian). Thus, I d
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:37 AM Gianfranco Costamagna <
locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
>
> >But, if I am able to adopt this package, then I would move this under
> >debian's collab-maint project.
>
>
> where did the current maintainer orph
18 matches
Mail list logo
