Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2017, 20:15 -0700 schrieb Stephen Dennis:
> Thanks for the starting point. I had worked out the d/watch file
> enough
> that it works locally (mentors.debian.net still complains), but I
> like your
> wildcards better, so I'm using that one (mentors.
Thanks for the starting point. I had worked out the d/watch file enough
that it works locally (mentors.debian.net still complains), but I like your
wildcards better, so I'm using that one (mentors.debian.net still
complains). The simple short d/rules is very much appreciated. I only just
begin to d
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2017, 00:24 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
>
> I wrote you a rule file as starting point. Attached. It is thought to
> get you started.
> (Some parts are missing, like the hardening; also stuff and you need
> to
> do outside of the rules, like to create the file d/clean with
Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2017, 13:06 -0700 schrieb Stephen Dennis:
> I've never been able to get the watch file to work right, and it is
> mis-behaving like it always has.
Admitted watchfiles are not easy :) And your directory layout makes it
even more difficult...
However, you can use this as star
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge"
* Package name: forge
Version : 0.9.2-2
Upstream Author : ArrayFire
* URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/forge
* License : BSD
Section : li
Hi Breno,
I've just uploaded a new package to fix that DTD warning. The linking I
made did not work on latest patch I had submitted.
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wok/wok_2.3.1-1.dsc
Regards,
--
Lucio Correia
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:35:42 + (UTC)
with message-id <2107864969.864.1483565742...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#850162: RFS: patat/0.4.6.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #850162,
regarding RFS: patat/0.4.6.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jan 2017 21:02:15 +
with message-id <1483563735.28927.16.ca...@gmail.com>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #849527,
regarding RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cid"
* Package name: cid
Version : 8.0-1
Upstream Author : Eduardo Moraes
* URL : https://c-i-d.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-3
Section : misc
I've never been able to get the watch file to work right, and it is
mis-behaving like it always has. I think I've made all the other changes
requested except I'm still a total loss as to how to migrate to the short
debhelper format.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Very mu
I've uploaded a new package with:
* fixes for all warnings
* forcing make with -j1 to avoid errors in .po generation
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wok/wok_2.3.1-1.dsc
Regards,
--
Lucio Correia
Le 04/01/2017 à 19:20, Patrick Schleizer a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> as upstream, does it make sense to run 'make clean' when running 'make all'?
>
> Would that be considered good or bad? Any convention on that?
>
> Best regards,
> Patrick
>
Dear Patrick,
This is not `good'. It makes some sort of sen
On 01/04/2017 07:20 PM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> as upstream, does it make sense to run 'make clean' when running 'make all'?
Typically it doesn't because it breaks incremental builds, which makes
development uglier. (You have to rebuild everything everytime you call
'make'.)
For the purpose of
Hi,
as upstream, does it make sense to run 'make clean' when running 'make all'?
Would that be considered good or bad? Any convention on that?
Best regards,
Patrick
On Jan 3, 2017 9:33 PM, "Paul Wise" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Taylor Kline wrote:
> Thanks, that does help a lot, and it helped me to realize that the
packages
> are built on the Debian machines and sent to users already built, so
there's
> no need for the users to install the Build
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please fix lintian problems, there are quite a lot of them.
Please use a single changelog entry.
The current recommended debhelper compat level is 10.
The package priority should be optional.
The package should not be native.
Please use the source format 3.0 (quilt).
Pl
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:14:23 +0500
with message-id <20170104161423.2is3i6hfmanpz...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#850081: RFS: qterm/1:0.7.1-1 [RC, ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #850081,
regarding RFS: qterm/1:0.7.1-1 [RC, ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means t
Uploaded, thanks!
Note that as your patch is following DEP-3 (it has Forwarded:), you could
record the original commit as
"Origin: upstream,
https://github.com/qterm/qterm/commit/3aeae9dfc6a56c2911a0e31fb27cd16ce276930e";.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "patat":
patat - Terminal-based presentations using Pandoc
Package: patat
Version: 0.4.6.0-1
Upstream Author: Jasper Van der Jeugt
Homepage: http://github.com/jaspervdj/patat
License: GPL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rdma-core"
* Package name: rdma-core
Version : 12-1.1
Upstream Author : Doug Ledford , Leon Romanovsky
* URL : https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core
* License
Dear Tobias and Tim,
Tobias, thank you very much for your response - I'm afraid I've only just
become aware of it.
> > Did you contact Tim? (CC'ed him with this mail; he still owns the ITP)
No - as Tim placed this package under the maintainance of the pkg-java team
I was following the pkg-java
21 matches
Mail list logo
