On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 02:15:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
>
> > Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
> > package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive
>
> apt install ratt
Poor
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: block 806720 by -1
Hi Frederick,
the ITP is owned by Thierry Fauck, did you check with him if it is ok
to take this ITP? (Should be done via the BTS and then the ITP's meta
data should be corrected accordingly.
Please remove the wontfix when this has been resolv
Control: block 775747 by -1
Please retitle the "RFP" bug (#775747) to "ITP" and set yourself as
owner.
--
tobi
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: block 768375 by -1
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 17:16:52 + Christopher Hoskin wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "dropwizard-
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:11:52 + (UTC)
with message-id <1704688462.9068069.1482127912...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.
has caused the Debian Bug report #846399,
regarding RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's rele
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
> package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive
apt install ratt
> Extra points for running the autopkgtests (if any)
You should use autopk
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:01:15 + (UTC)
with message-id <934496706.9107344.1482127275...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847079: RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847079,
regarding RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Hello
Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my
package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive
Extra points for running the autopkgtests (if any)
thanks!
PS: pkg is python-pytest-timeout
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
key
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:47:50 + (UTC)
with message-id <174527167.9052226.1482126470...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#848199: RFS: evil-el/1.2.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #848199,
regarding RFS: evil-el/1.2.12-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
close 848638
thanks
Hi
> * New upstream release
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmalloc"
> * Add debian/libdmalloc5.symbols file.
> * Update debian/libdmalloc5.shlibs file.
seems that the symbols file needs some tweaks :)
G.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
* Package name: cdist
Version : 4.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* Url : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/
* Licenses: GP
On 18-12-2016 10:30, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
>> Ready for upload.
> The changelog still says 3.6.8.
Mind crashing, I've noticed just the 's' missing on standard[s]-version.
--
Lucas Castro
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexec"
* Package name: gexec
Version : 0.4-2
Upstream Author : Ferry Boender
* URL : https://github.com/fboender/gexec
* License : GPL-2+
Section
Hi Tobias,
>-- CFLAGS += `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS` looks wrong
this is done sometimes to make cmake aware of CPPFLAGS [1]
this package however uses autotools, and I don't know about it :)
[1] https://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12928
G.
control: tags -1 wontfix
mentors says:
"Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution"
so please first fix this and then remove the wontfix tag.
--
tobi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Félix,
(I won't sponsor this because I will not find time to do so before the
Stretch-Window will close, except you'll be very fast in providing an
updated package; Any other DD can/should grab this package if wanted)
some remarks:
- d/changelog does not contain th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-keyring"
* Package name: mercurial-keyring
Version : 1.1.7-1
Upstream Author : Marcin Kasperski
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mercurial_keyring
* License : BSD-3-clause
Section
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:25:50 +0100
with message-id <1482092750.28465.6.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: eoconv/1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #848200,
regarding RFS: eoconv/1.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Hallo juliarl...@gmail.com,
I've neither found the ITP nor I found a package to review.
Additionally there were concerns about the suitabiltity of Julien for
Debian at this stage.
Please read https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers,
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/c
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:21:12 +0100
with message-id <1482092472.28465.5.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if
applicable] -- New Programming Language
has caused the Debian Bug report #846259,
regarding RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP,
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
(Please remove the moreinfo tag once your updated package is ready to
be reviewed)
Hi foss.freedom,
(I won't sponsor this because I will not find time to do so before the
Stretch-Window will close, except you'll be very fast in providing an
updated package; Any other DD can/should grab this package if wanted)
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:47:34 + "foss.freedom" wrote:
> Change
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hallo Pali,
(I won't sponsor this because I will not find time to do so before the
Stretch-Window will close, except you'll be very fast in providing an
updated package)
Here's a review:
- d/changelog: The changelog for 1.5-1 has a different timestamp than
the one in t
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:06:03 +0100
with message-id <1482087963.28367.3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-7 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #848420,
regarding RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-7 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-indicator-applet"
* Package name: budgie-indicator-applet
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : David Mohammed
* URL : https://github.com/UbuntuBudgie/b
On 18 December 2016 at 07:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 18 December 2016 at 09:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | since yesterday I'm not able to build any r-* packages any more in
| | pbuilder. I get something like:
| |
| | ...
| | Selecting previously unselected package r-base-co
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Christoph Mathys wrote:
> Thanks for the information. Altough I don't agree with "does not work". "Has
> a bug that has no impact on the core functionality" is more accurate.
Sorry, I didn't think about what commands are affected.
> I'll package the new ve
On 18.12.2016 14:49, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The package doesn't work, see
https://bitbucket.org/Mekk/mercurial_keyring/issues/52/keyring_check-crashes
Thanks for the information. Altough I don't agree with "does not work".
"Has a bug that has no impact on the
Hi Félix,
Thanks for working on this package!
If you’re willing to move this package to pkg-go, I’m willing to sponsor
it :). Please see https://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/
Félix Sipma writes:
> Download with dget:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/restic/restic_0.3
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hallo Carlos,
Did you (try) to contact the maintainers? I could also not see an
debdiff to the BTS where you announcing the NMU. (If I missed it please
post the bug number)
Also, there are many changes that are really out of scope an NMU*, like
the change to debhelper, r
Am Sonntag, den 18.12.2016, 16:07 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Vicent,
>
> Am Samstag, den 17.12.2016, 00:46 +0100 schrieb Vincent Carluer:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my p
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Vicent,
Am Samstag, den 17.12.2016, 00:46 +0100 schrieb Vincent Carluer:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmacro"
>
> * Package name: xmacro
> Version : 0.3pre-29
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The package doesn't work, see
https://bitbucket.org/Mekk/mercurial_keyring/issues/52/keyring_check-crashes
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 18 December 2016 at 09:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi,
|
| since yesterday I'm not able to build any r-* packages any more in
| pbuilder. I get something like:
|
| ...
| Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.^M
| Preparing to unpack .../102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...^M
|
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> Ready for upload.
The changelog still says 3.6.8.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 +confirmed
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:40:16AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Good idea. See 0ed6f10622b59874ad9d1008172439de9c1a8388
Thanks for preparing a new upload -- LGTM.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 09:27:27AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax:
> version string is empty^M
https://bugs.debian.org/848422
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
since yesterday I'm not able to build any r-* packages any more in
pbuilder. I get something like:
...
Selecting previously unselected package r-base-core.^M
Preparing to unpack .../102-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb ...^M
dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: dpkg: error: version '' has bad syntax
40 matches
Mail list logo
