Hello Forum:
One of my last package, gmp-ecm, not to mention it, failed to built on the mips
architecture:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gmp-ecm&arch=mips&ver=6.4.4%2Bds-5&stamp=1449086277
Fortunately enough, I have access to a mips Debian porter right now. So I tried
to reprod
Your message dated Thu, 03 Dec 2015 04:31:41 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #805511,
regarding RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 03 Dec 2015 04:31:41 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: adjtimex/1.29-6 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #806797,
regarding RFS: adjtimex/1.29-6 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Ben Wiederhake writes:
> This is the license header, in case you're too lazy to click the link:
>
> > "License": Public Domain
> > I, Mathias Panzenböck, place this file hereby into the public domain. Use
> > it at your own risk for whatever you like.
> > In case there are jurisdictions that don
Hello,
tl;dr: I'm trying to write the debian/copyright for a "use any license"
file.
This is the exact state of the file I'm talking about:
https://gist.github.com/PkmX/63dd23f28ba885be53a5/c89538c921f08f8dbb5bc5957c871060c720605a
This is the license header, in case you're too lazy to click t
On 2 December 2015 at 20:22, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 2 December 2015 at 13:33, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>>> I guess he just released 1.29 and forgot to put it in upstream's website.
>>> I didn't contact him and confirm this yet, but he seems
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 2 December 2015 at 13:33, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> I guess he just released 1.29 and forgot to put it in upstream's website.
>> I didn't contact him and confirm this yet, but he seems to be MIA for
>> a few years. [0]
>
> Hmm. It would be
Forwarded Message
Subject:Willing to help
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:04:44 -0600
From: John Goerzen
To: 777...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
I'm a DD that is willing to review/test this, but I don't see a current
package out there. Can you try again?
John
Hi,
I'm a DD that is willing to review/test this, but I don't see a current
package out there. Can you try again?
John
On 2 December 2015 at 13:33, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Dear Felipe,
>
> Thanks for your favor!
>
>> - uscan tells me that there is no 1.29 version in the upstream page.
>> And indeed there is only 1.28. What happened?
>> - It would be great if you forward your patches upstream.
>
> I actually created
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:32:21 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: libwebsock/1.0.7-5-gd7d0c01-1 [ITP] -- C library
for easy WebSockets servers
has caused the Debian Bug report #790096,
regarding RFS: libwebsock/1.0.7-5-gd7d0c01-1 [ITP] -- C library for easy
WebSock
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:32:19 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix]
has caused the Debian Bug report #806754,
regarding RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:32:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: opengm/2.3.6-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #803674,
regarding RFS: opengm/2.3.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:32:19 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: w1retap/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire
weather sensors
has caused the Debian Bug report #791724,
regarding RFS: w1retap/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:32:18 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: cuba/3.0+2024-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #792156,
regarding RFS: cuba/3.0+2024-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:32:19 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]
has caused the Debian Bug report #806389,
regarding RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Dear Felipe,
Thanks for your favor!
> - uscan tells me that there is no 1.29 version in the upstream page.
> And indeed there is only 1.28. What happened?
> - It would be great if you forward your patches upstream.
I actually created the pkg repo by "gbp import-dscs --debsnap
adjtimex", so now I
(moving discussion to RFS bug, please keep me in CC)
On 1 December 2015 at 11:15, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Dear Felipe,
>
> Considering now we have consensus on the service file except the
> description part, which is quite minor, I made a release build of
> adjtimex package and uploaded to mentors
On 02/12/15 13:14, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
While the package does work without those components (setup.py falls back to
using the Python implementation of the algorithms, and tests.py includes tests
cases that do not depend on the .csv files), I'm wondering what should be done
about the issue:
Dear Mentors,
as part of my first formal attempt to package some software into Debian [1], I
have stumbled upon an issue that I could not find the recommend way to solve,
and I'd really welcome any input or guidance.
The upstream package is hosted on GitHub [2], providing releases both there and
Dear Andrew,
Thanks for your prompting feedback!
> In the past, I have imported nat-traverse from Grml. Michal Prokop
> initially packaged it, but hasn't updated it since, even in Grml, so I
> kept the history in the changelog, updated the package and uploaded it.
Good to hear your packaging sto
Dear Mentors,
I'm going to ITP a package not in debian but already in other Debian
based distro for years. From technical side, I think it's kinda like
ITA, because all Debian packaging related stuff is already there.
Since I didn't find any document describing how to do with this kind
of case, I
23 matches
Mail list logo
