Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2015 04:25:33 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #788850,
regarding RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi!
> general
> * Have you considered maintaining the package as part of the
> Debian Games team?
> * Have you contacted Etienne Millon <>?
> He may be interested in this (as the maintainer of the vba
> package).
I just tried on #debian-games, I will contacted Millon.
> d/control:
> * Why are
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:34:04PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> So, the debian/rules file is simple
> ---8<--
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
> %:
> dh $@
> ---8<--
>
> However, for some reason dh tries to run "configure" etc., which
> ofcourse fails. How can I explicitely spec
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 06/15/2015 05:20 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cligj"
I've sponsored the upload, and since it was a straightforward new
upstream release I have not further comments.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GP
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cligj"
Package name: python-cligj
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Sean Gillies
URL : https://github
On 15 June 2015 at 16:34, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package that needs no build, but just the installation of the
> (script) files. All installation is done via debian/install,
> debian/docs, debian/examples.
>
> So, the debian/rules file is simple
>
> ---8<--
> #!/usr/bi
Hi,
I have a package that needs no build, but just the installation of the
(script) files. All installation is done via debian/install,
debian/docs, debian/examples.
So, the debian/rules file is simple
---8<--
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@
---8<--
However, for some
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gbutils"
* Package name: gbutils
Version : 5.6.6-1
Upstream Author : Giulio Bottazzi
* URL : http://cafed.sssup.it/software/gbutils/gbutils.html
* License
Hi Vincent,
Oops, I probably uploaded the wrong version. The get-orig-source target
uses the date of the last debian/changelog entry to set timestamps, so I
must've changed that without regenerating the tarball.
Reuploaded, should be fixed now.
Best,
James
On 14/06/2015 11:47 PM, Vincent Ch
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sblim-wbemcli"
* Package name: sblim-wbemcli
Version : 1.6.3-1
Upstream Author : Tyrel Datwyler
* URL :
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/sblim/index.php?
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:57:07 +0200
with message-id <1434365827.21711.12.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#787578: RFS: soci/3.2.3-1 [ITP] -- C++ Database Access
Library
has caused the Debian Bug report #787578,
regarding RFS: soci/3.2.3-1 [ITP] -- C++ Database Access Libra
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2015, 10:39 -0400 schrieb Bill Blough:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:41:08PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Quoting Bill Blough :
> >
> > I suggest that you base your work on my repository. (link to the repository
> > is in the
El Dilluns, 15 de juny de 2015, a les 16:27:20, Paul Wise va escriure:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > and propose what?
>
> Sounds like the only thing they need to do is to install them into the
> right path:
>
> /usr/lib/$PACKAGE/plugins/
>
> Maybe they
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> and propose what?
Sounds like the only thing they need to do is to install them into the
right path:
/usr/lib/$PACKAGE/plugins/
Maybe they even already have a configure option for that?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/P
El Dilluns, 15 de juny de 2015, a les 12:08:58, Paul Wise va escriure:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > The question is that the package creates a few libraries in /usr/lib and a
> > bunch of small libraries (used as plugins but treated libraries by
> > upstre
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:22:05 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#788218: RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #788218,
regarding RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote:
>>>
>>> roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
>>> roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)
>>> roxterm-gtk2-d
17 matches
Mail list logo
