Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Debian Mentors,
I have packaged tap.py:
* Package name: tap.py
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Matt LAYMAN
* URL : https://github.com/mblayman/tappy
* License : BSD-2
Section : python
tap.p
Your message dated Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:27:06 +0200
with message-id <551edb7a.3020...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line RFS: node-coffeeify/1.0.0-1 [ITP] [uploaded]
has caused the Debian Bug report #781763,
regarding RFS: node-coffeeify/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
hello Paul,
Paul Gevers writes:
> On 03-04-15 17:55, Felix Natter wrote:
>> does nobody have an opinion on this?
>>
>> In short: Is it better to have _a lot_ of beta gbp import-origs, commits
>> that are reverted/superceded etc. OR
>> develop on a private repository and copy the debian/* changes
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Debian Mentors,
I have packaged tap.py:
* Package name: tap.py
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Matt LAYMAN
* URL : https://github.com/mblayman/tappy
* License : BSD-2
Section : python
On 03/04/15 19:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 04/03/2015 05:56 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
Thanks again for another review Bas.
On 02/04/15 19:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
You may want to consider extending Use_through2.patch to cover all files
that use the through module, there are some
On 04/03/2015 05:56 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Thanks again for another review Bas.
>
> On 02/04/15 19:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> You may want to consider extending Use_through2.patch to cover all files
>> that use the through module, there are some tests that require it too.
>> Since the t
On 03-04-15 17:55, Felix Natter wrote:
> does nobody have an opinion on this?
>
> In short: Is it better to have _a lot_ of beta gbp import-origs, commits
> that are reverted/superceded etc. OR
> develop on a private repository and copy the debian/* changes to alioth
> on a release?
If this means
Thanks again for another review Bas.
On 02/04/15 19:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
You may want to consider extending Use_through2.patch to cover all files
that use the through module, there are some tests that require it too.
Since the test dependencies cannot be satisfied in Debian strictly
Felix Natter writes:
> hello mentors,
Dear mentors,
does nobody have an opinion on this?
In short: Is it better to have _a lot_ of beta gbp import-origs, commits
that are reverted/superceded etc. OR
develop on a private repository and copy the debian/* changes to alioth
on a release?
Thanks a
Your message dated Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:59:40 +0200
with message-id <551eaadc.1010...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line RFS: node-convert-source-map/1.0.0-1 [ITP] [uploaded]
has caused the Debian Bug report #781701,
regarding RFS: node-convert-source-map/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Thanks for the review :-)
On 02/04/15 19:47, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 04/01/2015 08:53 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-convert-source-map"
There are some minor issues that needs to be addressed befor
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2015, 22:51 +0300 schrieb Antti Järvinen:
back to the package:
> Hmm, I could do something like introducing a build-time dependency to
> imagemagick (I think I crafted the lower-resolution bitmaps with gimp by
> hand) and try to do the format+size conversion tricks with th
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2015, 22:51 +0300 schrieb Antti Järvinen:
> Tobias Frost writes:
> > Control: owner -1 !
> > Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Aye, best aprils fool's prank for some time :)
https://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS
>
> > Debian sees the (high-res image) as part of the source code
13 matches
Mail list logo
