Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-04-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Antti Järvinen wrote: > I'll write about this to debian-devel-announce. That is only for announcements :) > But here I need advice as https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer > says I'll need a PGP-key with at least 2k key length. > > The key I used at https://men

Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:27:52 Paul Wise wrote: > Personally I prefer to separate packaging from upstream development > because they are two different things. When I use a VCS for packaging > it contains only the debian/ directory. This is how I like to handle Debian packaging in git as well. -- Ch

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:20:34 Etienne Millon wrote: > I refreshed this, forwarded two patches and picked the upstream > version of one. Nice. But I meant to use all those headers (except for Applied-Upstream which I use ocassionally). > I'm not too familiar with how icons work, so I've installed

Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-04-01 Thread Antti Järvinen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tobias Frost writes: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 pending Aye, best aprils fool's prank for some time :) > Debian sees the (high-res image) as part of the source code, the > preferred form of the source actually. So you should include

Bug#781702: RFS: h5py/2.4.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5

2015-04-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal I am looking for a sponsor for the source package "h5py". It builds the following binary packages: python-h5py -- Python 2 version python3-h5py -- Python 3 version This upload brings the package up to date with the most recent stable upstream

Bug#781701: RFS: node-convert-source-map/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-convert-source-map" * Package name: node-convert-source-map Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Thorsten Lorenz (http://thlorenz.com) * URL : https://github

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Etienne Millon
* Alexandre Detiste [150401 20:22]: > Le mercredi 1 avril 2015, 20:38:30 Dmitry Smirnov a écrit : > > Hmm, how about doing it gnu-make-style? > > I tried that too, but this doesn't work as I expected ("Only the first ‘%’ in > the pattern and replacement is treated this way; any subsequent ‘%’ i

Bug#781381: marked as done (RFS: h5py/2.2.1-2~exp1 -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5)

2015-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:47:53 +0100 with message-id and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #781381, regarding RFS: h5py/2.2.1-2~exp1 -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le mercredi 1 avril 2015, 20:38:30 Dmitry Smirnov a écrit : > Hmm, how about doing it gnu-make-style? I tried that too, but this doesn't work as I expected ("Only the first ‘%’ in the pattern and replacement is treated this way; any subsequent ‘%’ is unchanged." from the manual) -- icons := $

Bug#771433: marked as done (RFS: xastir/2.0.6-1)

2015-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:49:16 +0100 with message-id <20150401134916.ga27...@shiftout.net> and subject line xastir/2.0.6-1 uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #771433, regarding RFS: xastir/2.0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:38:30 Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Hmm, how about doing it gnu-make-style? Just kidding, your way is OK, just please pass "--mode=644 --preserve-timestamps" to install (taking care of reproducible build etc.). Also you can replace `mkdir` with `-D` option to `install`. -- Chee

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:19:15 Alexandre Detiste wrote: > I fixed the icon location. > > for size in 22 24 32 48 128 ; do \ > - mkdir -p usr/share/icons/hicolor/$${size}x$${size}/apps ;\ > - install linux/icons/tyrian-$${size}.png > usr/share/icons/hicolor/$${size}x$${size}/apps/opentyrian.png ;\ > +

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Alexandre Detiste
> Thanks for taking the time to look at this. Thanks too. I fixed the icon location. for size in 22 24 32 48 128 ; do \ - mkdir -p usr/share/icons/hicolor/$${size}x$${size}/apps ;\ - install linux/icons/tyrian-$${size}.png usr/share/icons/hicolor/$${size}x$${size}/apps/opentyrian.png ;\ + mkdir

Bug#781622: RFS: opentyrian/2.1.20130907-1 [ITP]

2015-04-01 Thread Etienne Millon
* Dmitry Smirnov [150401 07:34]: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:35:12 Etienne Millon wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opentyrian" > > That is very nice. I was looking forward to see opentyrian in Debian for a > while. Thanks for packaging. Thanks for taking the time to look at th

Re: RC-bug listed on https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/all.html

2015-04-01 Thread Werner Detter
Hi Niels, thanks for your quick reply. > Note that uploading it to proposed-updates is not sufficient to mark it > as fixed in stable. If you have uploaded the fix for the coming point > release, the bug will remain open until the release actually happens. Okay, I see. This means that everythin