Re: shlib symbolic link to optional lib in lib-dev ?

2015-03-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Václav Ovsík wrote: > I decided to package debug variant of shared library now. Could you mention how the debug variant differs from the normal variant? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debi

Bug#780069: RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA

2015-03-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > The debian/upstream/upstream file is incorrectly named. Woops, forgot the reference for this: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.d

Bug#780069: RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA

2015-03-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org, Paul Wise Please use an X-Debbugs-CC pseudo-header in the mail body instead in future: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codespell" The debian/upstrea

shlib symbolic link to optional lib in lib-dev ?

2015-03-08 Thread Václav Ovsík
Hi, I'm preparing a new version of package src:ustr (Micro string library) I decided to package debug variant of shared library now. So I have libustr-dev and shared library libustr-1.0-1 and libustr-debug-1.0-1. I don't want to depend libustr-dev on libustr-debug-1.0-1, only recommend the package

Bug#780069: RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA

2015-03-08 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codespell" * Package name: codespell Version : 1.7-1 Upstream Author : Lucas de Marchi * URL : https://github.com/lucasdemarchi/codespell * License

Bug#768487: marked as done (RFS: fasm/1.71.22-1 [ITP] -- fast assembler for the x86 and x86-64 architectures)

2015-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Mar 2015 23:50:29 +0100 with message-id <20150308225029.ga8...@buchert.pl> and subject line Sponsor found has caused the Debian Bug report #768487, regarding RFS: fasm/1.71.22-1 [ITP] -- fast assembler for the x86 and x86-64 architectures to be marked as done. This means

Bug#777434: marked as done (RFS: slides/1.0.1-14 [ITA] -- Python-based Slide Maker)

2015-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Mar 2015 08:33:11 +1100 with message-id <20150309083311.7cce633fe13e4ef6f564e...@bitmessage.ch> and subject line Closing bug has caused the Debian Bug report #777434, regarding RFS: slides/1.0.1-14 [ITA] -- Python-based Slide Maker to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#780032: RFS: deheader/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-08 Thread Reiner Herrmann
On 03/08/2015 04:20 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 8 mars 2015 15:43 +0100, Reiner Herrmann : > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deheader" > [...] > > Uploaded. Thanks! > Cool, thank you very much! :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#778729: Try 2: Bug#778729: RFS: git-tools/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2015-03-08 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Adam, On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:52:15 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:53:52AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > * Package name: git-tools > > * URL : https://github.com/MestreLion/git-tools > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > git-restore-mtime - s

Bug#780032: RFS: deheader/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 mars 2015 15:43 +0100, Reiner Herrmann  : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deheader" [...] Uploaded. Thanks! -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#780032: RFS: deheader/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-03-08 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deheader" * Package name: deheader Version : 1.1-1 Upstream Author : Eric S. Raymond * URL : http://www.catb.org/~esr/deheader/ * License : BSD Section

Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-03-08 Thread Antti Järvinen
Riley Baird writes: > ... just two more things: > > -Add a d/source/format containing the only the string "3.0 > (quilt)" (without the quotation marks). This ensures that your package > will use the new format for any patches you may make in future. > > -You can add a d/watch file to check