On 2015-03-04 02:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
* Remove async.js and use packaged version instead
This looks a lintian false positive, the async
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead
>>
>> This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is
>> quite different from t
On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> * Fix duplicate package descriptions
>
> You may want to tweak these a bit to be more in line with other node-*
> and libjs-* packages.
>
> See for example node-q:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-q.git/tree/debian/
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:53:52AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> * Package name: git-tools
> * URL : https://github.com/MestreLion/git-tools
>
> It builds those binary packages:
> git-restore-mtime - set timestamps to the date of a file's last commit
Hi guys again! Lemme ping y
Le Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit :
> Hello,
> I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two
> packages using the machine style copyright.
>
> The expanded version states "This paragraph define an already defined
> license.", however the pa
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on the bluebird packaging!
On 03/03/2015 09:01 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> * Fix duplicate package descriptions
You may want to tweak these a bit to be more in line with other node-*
and libjs-* packages.
See for example node-q:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-j
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-bluebird"
* Package name: node-bluebird
Version : 2.9.13+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Petka Antonov
* URL : https://github.com/petkaantonov/bluebird
* License
Hello Daniel,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:18:13PM +, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with:
> > (paragraph at line 25)
> > (paragraph at line 66)
> > (paragraph at line 84)
> >
> >
Hi Helge,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with:
> (paragraph at line 25)
> (paragraph at line 66)
> (paragraph at line 84)
> (paragraph at line 102)
> (paragraph at line 128)
> (paragraph at line 171)
> (p
Hello,
I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two
packages using the machine style copyright.
The expanded version states "This paragraph define an already defined
license.", however the paragraphs I checked only use GPL-2+.
I read the specification and looked at the e
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:02:57PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > >git import-orig --pristine-tar ../fastaq_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz
> >
> > I know that you need the upstream version:
> "What is the upstream version? [3.2.0" in
Quoting Barry Warsaw :
On Feb 28, 2015, at 04:37 PM, Daniel Stender wrote:
1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright?
IANAL but the PSF's policy on use of its trademarks is clearly stated here:
https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/
They are also fairly permissive
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.1-1
of my package "cl-launch".
It builds these binary packages:
cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found o
13 matches
Mail list logo
