Hi Elmar,
It's OK that you write your own non-free license, but this license in
particular has, in my opinion, too many serious flaws to allow it in section
non-free. I suggest to get professional legal advice or to use an existing
well-known license.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
T o n g writes:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:14:48 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
>> Tadaa ... it is ${DESTDIR}. Which leads us to the conclusion that, as
>> stated in my initial reply, that the lack thereof is the culprit
> So how to fix it then? Upstream has been dead for several years. I have
> fi
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:14:48 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
>> I took a look at the good build, which is glimpse-4.18.5, and I see:
>>
>> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
>> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d
>> /export/build/glimpse/bld/
>> glimps
> I took a look at the good build, which is glimpse-4.18.5, and I see:
>
> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /export/build/glimpse/bld/
> glimpse-4.18.5/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1 ; \
> done
Do you know what /export
T o n g writes:
> Hmm... I don't know if that is accurate, because it is at the end of
> binary package *building*, not the binary package *installation*.
Upstream doesn't appear to support DESTDIR in their build system and is
just trying to install things directly under prefix. You can possi
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:40:46 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> >> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
>> >> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \
>> >> done
>> >
>> > Obviously, that should be ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1 .
Hmm... I don't know
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a nmu upload of the package "syfi"
* Package name: syfi
Version : 1.0.0.dfsg-1.2
Section : devel
This is the nmu changelog entry:
> syfi (1.0.0.dfsg-1.2) unstable; urgency=
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:28:33PM +, T o n g wrote:
> >> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
> >>/usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \
> >>done
> >
> > Obviously, that should be ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1 .
>
> So given the rules file p
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:21:11 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
>> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
>> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \
>> done
>
> Obviously, that should be ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1 .
So given the rules file posted in
Hi,
> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \
> done
Obviously, that should be ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1 .
Cheers,
Nik
--
* concerning Mozilla code leaking assertion failures to tty without D-BUS *
Hi,
The package that I'm planning to maintain gives me the following error at
the end of the build:
for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
/usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \
done
/usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file '/usr/shar
Hey gustavo and Tong,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:20:14PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> On 11/11/2013 08:36 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use
> > Docker. I've got it packaged and it'll be in Debian soon.
>
> do you have a pack
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:36:39PM +0100, Andreas Moog wrote:
> The author of the software actually addresses this point in Makefile.am:
>
> "# @GTK_LIBS@ & libdbus_CFLAGS are not used to avoid unwanted
> # libraries (like -latk, -lrt, etc.) passed to the linker"
Ahhh, this explains
On 11/11/2013 08:36 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use
> Docker. I've got it packaged and it'll be in Debian soon.
do you have a package, even preview quality, to use it?
i would check git.d.o but is down :(
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717
Hi Axel,
I'd sponsor tht package in general as I use it (the old upstream
package) and would be happy to see it in Debian.
thank you for your support.
Looking at the sponsorship request shows me already two issues:
* Section: python
* Binary: python-automx
This is a server application, no
El dg 03 de 11 de 2013 a les 08:23 -0500, en/na Mark Buda va escriure:
> I am confused. 728292 is an RFS, 688531 is the ITA. And neither is mentioned
> in that link.
>
> What am I not understanding?
This link is generated twice a day. It may be a temporary mistake or
maybe setting you as the ow
16 matches
Mail list logo
