Bug#729091: RFS: gtkiostream/1.3.0

2013-11-08 Thread Matt Flax
Hi again, I have now fixed this problem and uploaded the source code to sf.net, the new release file name is : gtkiostream-1.3.0.fixedDeb.tar.gz Attatched is the diff between the original source release and the one on sf.net. Thanks again for catching this bug. Please let me know of any oth

Bug#729091: RFS: gtkiostream/1.3.0

2013-11-08 Thread Matt Flax
Hi Dainel, Thank you very much for finding this bug. I will remove the machine generated code from the distribution ... which should fix this build bug. I will post back once it is done. thanks again Matt On 09/11/13 09:37, Daniel Lintott wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Bug#729091: RFS: gtkiostream/1.3.0

2013-11-08 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Matt, Re: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/11/msg00068.html I have just attempted the build again and it fails in the same place as before, with the same error. This is using a fully updated Debian sid chroot. Regards Daniel -BEG

Bug#729091: RFS: gtkiostream/1.3.0

2013-11-08 Thread Matt Flax
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkiostream": * Package name: gtkiostream Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : Matt Flax * URL :http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkiostream/ * License

Re: Sponsor for the gtkiostream

2013-11-08 Thread Matt Flax
Thanks for the info, I am about to send an RFS to bugs. If you use Debian sid to build, those errors you got below don't exist. thanks MAtt On 09/11/13 01:50, Daniel Lintott wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Matt, I'm not a DD myself, so can't upload your package but I

Re: Fwd: Re: Gramps Version 3.4.6

2013-11-08 Thread Ross Gammon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2013 11:43 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:33:46 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote: > >> That also helped me fix the next lintian warning by guessing >> that under the "rm", a "cp debian/gramps.xpm >> debian//gramps/usr/share/pixm

Bug#728716: xchroot: packaging as non-free

2013-11-08 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
You're free to try to get it into non-free. Thanks! Paul How to apply for acceptance in non-free? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/527d2777.20

Bug#728716: xchroot: packaging as non-free

2013-11-08 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Email ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org with your license, and the ftpteam will disucss if we can distribute it safely. If so, you can upload it to non-free. Ask your sponsor for more information on that. Please note that non-free is *not* Debian (the distribution), but is mearely software hosted on

Bug#728716: [License-review] For Approval: Scripting Free Software License, Version 1.3.5 (S-FSL v1.3.5)

2013-11-08 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > >>"specific to someone": Well this is an unavoidable necessity in order to > >Maybe, but specific clauses like this clearly violate OSD #3 and #5 > >(#3: if your downstream “A” is a “public distribution” and A’s > >downstream “B”

Bug#728716: [License-review] For Approval: Scripting Free Software License, Version 1.3.5 (S-FSL v1.3.5)

2013-11-08 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Am 07.11.2013 20:21, schrieb Thorsten Glaser: However it is not an OSD criterium Independent on whether it is or not (it’s not explicitly listed, as are other things people have commented on, but some of these things can be inferred from the OSD), I said in my first eMail that I’d do a genera

Re: Sponsor for the gtkiostream

2013-11-08 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Matt, I'm not a DD myself, so can't upload your package but I shall give my review of it, in the hope it can help you to find a sponsor. It may be worth you filing an RFS bug against the pseudo-package sponsorship-requests [1] and the standard for

Re: How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > That seems obvious to me but I wonder whether this is not part of the > result of pkg-config ... Neither of the uses of PKG_CHECK_MODULES include gio: http://sources.debian.net/src/artha/1.0.2-1/configure.ac#L58 http://sources.debian.net/src

Re: How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:00:30PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > libtool: link: gcc ... -lX11 -ldbus-1 -ldbus-glib-1 -lgtk-x11-2.0 > > -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -pthread > ,,, > > Any ideas? > > g_file_delete come

Re: How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > libtool: link: gcc ... -lX11 -ldbus-1 -ldbus-glib-1 -lgtk-x11-2.0 > -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -pthread ,,, > Any ideas? g_file_delete comes from -lgio-2.0, which is missing. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/

How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when trying to build the latest artha version which is in SVN at svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/artha/trunk/ I end up with libtool: link: gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -pedantic -Wno-unused-parameter -fstrict-aliasing -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pthread -I/usr/incl

Bug#729043: RFS: automx/0.10.0-1 [ITP] automx -- A mail user agent auto configuration service #662168

2013-11-08 Thread Walter Reiner
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "automx" * Package name: automx Version : 0.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Marc Schiffbauer * URL : https://github.com/sys4/automx * License : GPLv3, MIT