On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +0000, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > >>"specific to someone": Well this is an unavoidable necessity in order to > >Maybe, but specific clauses like this clearly violate OSD #3 and #5 > >(#3: if your downstream “A” is a “public distribution” and A’s > >downstream “B” isn’t, B cannot distribute them under the same terms > >as it got them from A under). > Well we could crop out this special facilitation but that would make > the license less fit for practical purposes. I do not want to sacrifice > practical fitness towards perfectly strict OSI compliance.
To be clear, not satisfying OSD 3 & 5 (DFSG 3 and 5 as well) this will *NOT* be fit for Debian main. You're free to try to get it into non-free. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
