On 20-07-13 06:31, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:11:46 +, T o n g wrote:
>>> That part was fully clear to me. And as I said, in my tries it was
>>> always there.
>>
>> So you did the above normal steps as building any binary package but get
>> different result? Or did you do something
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:11:46 +, T o n g wrote:
>>> Did you try to build debian binary package from there?
>>
>> So please tell me what you mean with this sentence, I just don't know
>> what you mean.
>
> build debian binary package from the source package that you just built.
>
>>> I'll get
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:57:14 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
- I then build the upstream into *source package* with 'debuild -S
-sa',
and then build the binary debian package *from this source package*.
The binary package built this way is however empty.
>>>
>>> So how do you do the
Hello, again.
I made it: 717...@bugs.debian.org
Could you please hint me what should be next?
2013/7/19 Mònica Ramírez
> El dv 19 de 07 de 2013 a les 09:16 +0400, en/na Anton Balashov va
> escriure:
> > Thank you for your pay attention on that.
> > I made a new letter:
> > From: Anton Balash
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:23:45 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: xorg-gtest/0.7.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #699846,
regarding RFS: xorg-gtest/0.7.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Am Freitag, den 19.07.2013, 13:02 +0600 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 07:53:51AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Ltt-controls has not been built on all archs (those out of date messages on
> > the PTS). Seems that there are build deps not available.
> > (Take a look at the b
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "niceshaper"
* Package name: niceshaper
Version : 1.0.0-2
Upstream Author : Mariusz Jedwabny
* URL : http://niceshaper.jedwabny.net/
* License : GPLv2+
Hi Tong,
On 19-07-13 15:14, T o n g wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:38:49 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Which I don't have anymore, so indeed please repeat it if you want my
>> help.
>
> It was still included in the message that I previously replied.
Sure. therefore the word "indeed".
>>> - I t
I had read the documentation I understand the process.
Now I have to find a sponsor for finish it.
Thanks.
2013/7/19 Anton Balashov
> Hello, again.
>
> I made it: 717...@bugs.debian.org
>
> Could you please hint me what should be next?
>
>
> 2013/7/19 Mònica Ramírez
>
>> El dv 19 de 07 de 20
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (04 Jul 2013 06:49:08 GMT) :
> I plan to review, and hopefully upload bilibop next week.
Here we go.
First, was the target distribution change in debian/changelog
intentional? (0.4.12 has experimental, 0.4.13 has unstable.)
Second, it looks like important changes and refacto
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:23:47 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: aspsms-t/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #701870,
regarding RFS: aspsms-t/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:00:22 +0300
with message-id <20130719130022.gb23...@ieval.ro>
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #716858,
regarding RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-3 [ITA] - GTK+ theme switching utility
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:38:49 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 19-07-13 05:13, T o n g wrote:
>> As said in OP,
>
> Which I don't have anymore, so indeed please repeat it if you want my
> help.
It was still included in the message that I previously replied.
>> - I unpack the upstream tarball and
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:40:40 +0200
with message-id <20130719134040.68e58...@debian.lan>
and subject line Allegro 2:4.4.2-4 uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #716850,
regarding RFS: allegro4.4/2:4.4.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
El dv 19 de 07 de 2013 a les 09:16 +0400, en/na Anton Balashov va
escriure:
> Thank you for your pay attention on that.
> I made a new letter:
> From: Anton Balashov
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: ITP: curseofwar/1.1.4-1
> With the same text.
> Is that right?
No, you should open an ITP
I finally feel like the package is in a better shape to be uploaded now,
so I am reopening my RFS.
Here are the updated details:
* Package name: amanda
Version : 1:3.3.4-1
Upstream Author : Amanda Development Team
* URL : http://www.amanda.org
* License
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 07:53:51AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Ltt-controls has not been built on all archs (those out of date messages on
> the PTS). Seems that there are build deps not available.
> (Take a look at the buildds status page)
It waits for ust to be built on ia64, mips, mipsel, s390
17 matches
Mail list logo
