Re: creative common

2012-10-10 Thread Mike Dupont
the http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community list might be better for questions like this but if you keep the exact same license it should not be a problem., On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote: > Dear all, > > Suppose i have a electronic magazine, So i want

Bug#674109: marked as done (RFS: turses/0.1.4-1 [ITP] -- Twitter client for the console)

2012-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:20:13 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: turses/0.1.4-1 [ITP] -- Twitter client for the console has caused the Debian Bug report #674109, regarding RFS: turses/0.1.4-1 [ITP] -- Twitter client for the console to be marked as done. This means

Processed: apt-fast: block ITP 690183 by RFS 690188

2012-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 690183 by 690188 Bug #690183 [wnpp] ITP: apt-fast -- shellscript wrapper for apt-get or aptitude 690183 was not blocked by any bugs. 690183 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 690183: 690188 > stop Stopping processing here.

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

2012-10-10 Thread tony mancill
On 10/08/2012 04:25 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 689980 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-furniture-editor" Hi Gabriele, I am reviewing this package and will sponsor an upload

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > "Converted to..." doesn't usually play well with the freeze policy. But in > this case the required changes are small enough that hopefully the Release > Team won't mind. Do you think I should change the Phrase like added the Format: Upstream

Re: (un)patching patched files

2012-10-10 Thread Jasmine Hassan
while that worked flawlessly, there might be problems on a subsequent build in the same tree, if you were renaming directories. To fix that, I added (to the aforementioned) an override_dh_autoreconf sequence: post_patch: [ -d src/new-dir ] || mv src/orig-dir src/new-dir override_dh_autorecon

creative common

2012-10-10 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Dear all, Suppose i have a electronic magazine, So i want to translate an article according to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ license, can i do it? --mohsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Bug#663916: New phonetisaurus package available

2012-10-10 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 10/10/2012 22:59, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: > * Giulio Paci , 2012-10-09, 02:16: >> git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/phonetisaurus.git. > > The ugly hack in debian/rules is indeed ugly. :) I definitively agree. I found a cleaner way to do that and applied it (by setting DEB_CLEAN_EXCLUDE in

Bug#690188: RFS: apt-fast/1.7.6-1 ITP

2012-10-10 Thread Dominique Lasserre
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "apt-fast". * Package name: apt-fast Version : 1.7.6-1 Upstream Authors: Matt Parnell, Dominique Lasserre * URL : https://github.com/ilikenwf/apt-fast.git *

Re: Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0(quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Jasmine Hassan
Thibaut, I should add that it is counter-productive and discouraging to fork the entire compiz* family just because we can't get 0.8.8 in unstable, which would allow me to simply bring back compiz-mate package that was dropped by a Non-maintainer (Michael) in 0.8.4-5.1 (the pre-last update, on 27

Bug#690049: RFS: sylkserver/2.1.1-1

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Daniel Pocock , 2012-10-09, 15:45: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sylkserver/sylkserver_2.1.1-1.dsc Lintian emits: P: sylkserver: no-upstream-changelog P: sylkserver-sounds: no-upstream-changelog I: sylkserver: init.d-script-does-not-i

Re: Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0(quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jasmine Hassan [121010 20:31]: > Bernhard R. Link writes: > >With "3.0 (quilt)" there usually is no unpatching (except if you use > >some explicit options). So if you need to revert the names, that would > >be done in the clean target instead. But I really do not see the point > >of renaming fi

Bug#663916: New phonetisaurus package available

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Giulio Paci , 2012-10-09, 02:16: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/phonetisaurus.git. The ugly hack in debian/rules is indeed ugly. :) Could you split it into multiple lines? 410 characters is really too long. Why is the filename between two -e expressions? Last but not least, why do

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 21:55: suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: + Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090) + Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint * debian/copyright: + Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611) "Con

Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1

2012-10-10 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Hello and thank you very much for your review! > > On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote: >> * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to >> unstable will follow the release of wheezy > > It

Re: Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0(quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Jasmine Hassan
Thibaut Paumard writes: > Raphaël is right: > - you should try to collaborate with other distributions on a > *single* fork. > - your fork should not be called "compiz", please pick a unique > name, such as compiz-mate or matepiz or whatever > There are no distributions. Only a fork

Re: Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0(quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Jasmine Hassan
Bernhard R. Link writes: With "3.0 (quilt)" there usually is no unpatching (except if you use some explicit options). So if you need to revert the names, that would be done in the clean target instead. But I really do not see the point of renaming files if you want to stick close to the original

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 11:03 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 09:16: > >>Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for > >>sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too? > > > >Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian > >copyright-format [0] this field can be

Processed: retitle to RFS: suckless-tools/38-2 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 683184 RFS: suckless-tools/38-2 [ITA] Bug #683184 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: suckless-tools/38-2 [ITA]' from 'RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]' > stop Stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 09:16: Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too? Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian copyright-format [0] this field can be free form text which means I can put with a note that spr

Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0 (quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 10/10/2012 09:20, Jasmine Hassan a écrit : > I believe unstable should move to 0.9.x, and let me fork 0.8.8 for > MATE. I have it running rock solid atm, completely integrated with > marco 1.4 (metacity's replacement) as the decorator, and

Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0 (quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jasmine Hassan [121010 04:45]: > For instance, I'm packaging Compiz 0.8.8, for MATE desktop. This, at > least initially, requires a lot of code substitutions, and quite a few > file/dir renaming. (ex.: gnome -> mate, gconf -> mateconf, metacity -> > marco, etc.) I use a home-brewed migration scr

Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0 (quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Jasmine Hassan
Removed Damyan from the loop, as this no longer concerns his article on renaming files & quilt http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/howto/quilt.html Also check http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648022 I believe unstable should move to 0.9.x, and let me fork 0.8.8 for MATE. I have it r

Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0 (quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote: > Exactly, and gnome 2.x is no longer maintained, nor is Compiz 0.8.8, > last in release 0.8.x from April 2011 So you have no other solution than to take over upstream maintenance. > > In that case, I truly believe that MATE should fork Compiz as well >

Re: Renaming files, patching, renaming files, unpatching, and 3.0 (quilt)

2012-10-10 Thread Jasmine Hassan
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote: >> For instance, I'm packaging Compiz 0.8.8, for MATE desktop. This, at >> least initially, requires a lot of code substitutions, and quite a few >> file/dir renaming. (ex.: gnome -> mate,

Bug#679402: ITP missing for package mysql-tzdata with RFS 679402

2012-10-10 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Hi, According to [0], mysql-tzdata has not its corresponding ITP bug. Please, could you file it? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#686513: ITP missing for package jampal with RFS 686513

2012-10-10 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Hi, According to [0], jampal has not its corresponding ITP bug. This bug is needed because jampal has been removed from Debian. If you want to reintroduce the package, please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencie