Thibaut Paumard <thib...@debian.org> writes: > Raphaël is right: > - you should try to collaborate with other distributions on a > *single* fork. > - your fork should not be called "compiz", please pick a unique > name, such as compiz-mate or matepiz or whatever >
There are no distributions. Only a fork in fedora, and at least one patch (no-more-mate-wm-settings.patch) collides with another I synced/migrated from ubuntu's compiz 0.8.6 series (562027-fix-mateconf-ftbfs.patch). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800 But I'll try, of course. In addition, but I believe you realize that already, your fork and the > mainstream compiz packages should remain co-installable at all time: > you need to rename/move all files, programs, libraries etc. > > Of course. > As for "unstable should move to 0.9.x", that's entirely up to the > compiz maintainers and the release team. Remember we are in a freeze > period, experimental has 0.9.2.1+git... > > Understandable. But there's still no compiz at all in testing :P > Regards, Thibaut. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQdSrpAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChABMgQAJtWzOKZVVr4SWHU+o1Haeg9 > vUrlEQ73+rivX06d7s0pLI54jfJsosGStDLB2F3Jhur3Q02/UF3z/+8ofXnshZdT > da8TTgV4KdGFabudiic2iGoVk2P1BUsb7xMQHKeQ3i+Nmv9E+QDBrZEUUhOJLGvB > TY7VRGR3cYlXn8/EyO9fkZz/eUhQIFEhhJ0onIC2HnI5oU9A844uYE4tiKu9WK5r > 8ZIOv8v7Qm+s+hHg4GzCgkzw2/wU/MUN6OXGnMQhH7ewloPfyK906Y+Ec7G/nrJ4 > nm5yeEaaMigS4hBuy9veqRD3bZ/mrA9mU7hkVXs1LzChWx74/oGmkvxSembFYld4 > Pu/d+I4jNH9Xe05Qmnha69Py8SLPOJAV55ryHyI4qgJiPuTXuuQw5wmyeva7vyuj > ZugC4hxGWknyIb/zmUj7wgTNPz50E9Eqh1Tmmq9swYuZh+jmaq0VzSdsfBt45V/x > lCVK53J5LYL8gBCJhoZa++f4E+KM9y9ebGL1FOV0BdVNbGwf9OYFpJEY7oeNUqmW > WDNA9QK6BvgRYXbP1T2YbU8ubpPUIRlPiFHG5sZiFz4YysU86kbmtDElHPaTASlD > 1/gy0e6+QLqD7a7YI6THNd622uIgJ3w0JcqU1MZsZ99/ud2rkMWTRBacER4gPJc5 > R1RNxL13tkR7Lu3fnDB5 > =ST8V > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Jasmine
