Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2012 04:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ecere-sdk/0.44.01-1 [ITP: #665332] - Ecere SDK
has caused the Debian Bug report #684944,
regarding RFS: ecere-sdk/0.44.01-1 [ITP: #665332] - Ecere SDK
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 686417 RFS: feedgnuplot/1.23-1 [ITP]
Bug #686417 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: feedgnuplot/1.22-2 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: feedgnuplot/1.23-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
feedgnuplot/1.22-2 [ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Hi Guo,
I had a look at gcc-doc-defaults at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-28 16:28.
I see that you added yourself to Uploaders. Was this agreed with Nikita V.
Youshchenko ?
I see that gcc-4.6-doc and gcc-4.7-doc need to go in first, so I suggest that
you mark gcc-doc-defaults "needs sponso
Hi Guo,
I had a look at gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-28
16:30.
I see that you added yourself to Uploaders. Was this agreed with Nikita V.
Youshchenko ?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz
"Detailed informat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 688126 + pending
Bug #688126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: textedit.app/4.0+20061029-3.4 [RC] [NMU]
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 675220 + pending
Bug #675220 [textedit.app] Maintainer or uploader address bounces
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
S
tags 688126 + pending
tags 675220 + pending
thanks
Howdy,
I've uploaded this to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut the
upload, or move it to 0day.
Debdiff attached.
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 688124 + pending
Bug #688124 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: kic/2.4a-1.1 [RC] [NMU]
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 685959 + pending
Bug #685959 [kic] Maintainer or uploader address bounces
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
tags 688124 + pending
tags 685959 + pending
thanks
Hello,
I've uploaded this bug to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut
the upload or move it to 0-day.
Debdiff attached.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 73
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685958 + pending
Bug #685958 [sauerbraten-wake6] Maintainer or uploader address bounces
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 688122 + pending
Bug #688122 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sauerbraten-wake6/1.0-1.1 [RC] [NMU]
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
tags 688122 + pending
thanks
Uploaded to DELAYED/4, thanks!
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 689087 by 689126
Bug #689087 [wnpp] ITP: sweethome3d-furnitures -- Interior 2D design
application with 3D preview (additional furnitures)
689087 was not blocked by any bugs.
689087 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 689087:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 685998 RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector
> package
Bug #685998 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: 0install/1.11-1 [ITP] -- rename
zeroinstall-injector package
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename ze
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 689126 -1
Bug #689126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1
[ITP]
Bug 689126 cloned as bug 689167
> retitle 689126 RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures/1.2-1 [ITP]
Bug #689126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweethome3d-fur
Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:20:18 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: glipper/2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688768,
regarding RFS: glipper/2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 689041 RFS: orthanc/0.2.1-6 [ITP] -- Lightweight, RESTful DICOM
> server for healthcare and medical research
Bug #689041 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: orthanc/0.2.1-4 [ITP] -- Lightweight,
RESTful DICOM server for healthcare and medical re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 689126 wishlist
Bug #689126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1
[ITP]
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689
Hi!
On 29/09/2012 13:06, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:56:49PM +0200, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cinnamon" for experimental.
>
> Why experimental? That'd just mean you will need an extra unnecessary
> upload. As there's no old versi
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:56:49PM +0200, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cinnamon" for experimental.
Why experimental? That'd just mean you will need an extra unnecessary
upload. As there's no old version of cinnamon in Debian, shunting it to
experimental do
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "sweethome3d-furnitures" and
"sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree"
* Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 689041 RFS: orthanc/0.2.1-4 [ITP] -- Lightweight, RESTful DICOM
> server for healthcare and medical research
Bug #689041 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: orthanc/0.2.1-3 [ITP] -- Lightweight,
RESTful DICOM server for healthcare and medical re
On 09/29/2012 05:38 PM, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/28/2012 09:02 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
>>> GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
>>> recently.
>>
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 09:02 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
>> GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
>> recently.
>
> yes. but you may want to try again.
No matter whe
22 matches
Mail list logo