On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jason Gerard DeRose , 2012-08-08, 06:40:
>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.9),
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity, why >= 8.9?
>>
>>
>> When I started working on this, 8.9 was the version in Debian testing. But
>> as I don't know if the current pack
On 08/07/2012 08:48 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 02:00:09AM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
>> On 08/05/2012 08:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vedran,
>>>
>>> I suggest to remove logkeys 0.1.1a+svn20120529-1 (2012-06-27 22:32) from
>>> mentors. It is no solution for bug 6791
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:20 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >Besides uploading the new package version to the Mentors site, I went
> > ahead & submitted a Request for Sponsor bug as well (#684106 [1])
>
> Here's my review of your package
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
>Besides uploading the new package version to the Mentors site, I went
> ahead & submitted a Request for Sponsor bug as well (#684106 [1])
Here's my review of your package:
In control:
Recommends: default-mta | mail-transport-agent, texlive
* Jakub Wilk , 2012-08-08, 19:55:
dh_python2 has now a --shebang option.
What I wrote is technically correct, but what I actually meant to write
is:
dh_python3 has now a --shebang option (even though it's not documented
in the manpage).
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
* Jason Gerard DeRose , 2012-08-08, 06:40:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.9),
Out of curiosity, why >= 8.9?
When I started working on this, 8.9 was the version in Debian testing.
But as I don't know if the current package actually works with 8.9, I
changed this to >= 9.20120608, the current
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> * Jason Gerard DeRose , 2012-08-04, 18:26:
>>
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyskein/pyskein_0.7.1-1.dsc
Thanks for taking the time to look this over and give me such detailed
feedback! Notes on my corrections foll
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 03:09 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > As this is a new upstream version, a good argument (with patches,
> > etc.) has to be prepared for the release team to have elements for
> > their decision about allowing it in wheezy. I think a pre-approval by
> > them would even be pr
8 matches
Mail list logo
