Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy?
>
> Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's usual meaning?
>
> You set it for stuff that should be in wheezy despite the
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2012 05:55:13 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.6-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #676608,
regarding RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 676608 RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.6-1 [ITP]
Bug #676608 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-2 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.6-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
python-x2go/0.2.0.5-2 [ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.3.3 (ITP #675467)
Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.3 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS:
bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote:
> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy?
Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's usual meaning?
You set it for stuff that should be in wheezy despite the bug.
What we'd want here, is some way to convey "do
Steven Ayre writes:
> Essentially it's simply a package that links mysql_tzinfo_to_sql and
> tzdata together using a trigger.
> When mysql-tzdata is first installed and then when tzdata is updated the
> postinst script is run, which loads the mysql_tzinfo_to_sql output into
> the mysql.timezone_
Marc Haber writes:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:53:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It would indeed be best if everything possible was documented, but very
>> few people volunteer to do the work to drive changes to the
>> documentation through to completion.
> This is partly because of the kin
Hi,
On 02.07.2012 17:06, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
>
>> Comments on these suggestions ?
>
> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? I
> guess that might be stepping on the release team's tags, so maybe
> setting up usercatego
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:53:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > It would indeed be best if everything possible was documented, but very
> > few people volunteer to do the work to drive changes to the documentation
> > through to completion.
>
> This is pa
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Comments on these suggestions ?
Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? I
guess that might be stepping on the release team's tags, so maybe
setting up usercategories and usertags for the sponsorship-requests
metapacka
It is indeed a small package. It only contains TODO, README and postinst
files. It triggered the lintian empty binary package warning until I put
'empty package' in the long description. I guess it'd be up to the FTP
masters.
Essentially it's simply a package that links mysql_tzinfo_to_sql and tzd
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:53:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> It would indeed be best if everything possible was documented, but very
> few people volunteer to do the work to drive changes to the documentation
> through to completion.
This is partly because of the kind-of heavy-handed policy edi
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:03:08PM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> On 02/07/12 02:03, Marc Haber wrote:
> >I am really really astonished about with which ease we hurl RC
> >bugs at packages without having thought-out alternatives.
> Would it not be better to reject the Debian QA 'suggestion' until
>
13 matches
Mail list logo