On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: > Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy?
Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's usual meaning? You set it for stuff that should be in wheezy despite the bug. What we'd want here, is some way to convey "do not waste your time messing with this bug if you care only about the next stable release". This includes unstable-only packages like gcc-snapshot. -- I was born an ugly, dumb and work-loving child, then an evil midwife replaced me in the crib. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702234122.ga13...@angband.pl
