Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 663685 + moreinfo
Bug #663685 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: openvpn-auth-radius/2.1-4 -- updated
packaging, hardening release goal
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
663685:
I had a look at this request, but sadly, the debdiff did not apply:
$ patch -p1 <663685.debdiff
patching file debian/rules
Hunk #2 FAILED at 21.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file debian/rules.rej
patching file debian/control
patching file debian/changelog
patching file debian/READM
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 01:30:41PM -0700, Ross Boylan a écrit :
> >
> > It's not my package, and for reasons of courtesy to the maintainer and
> > (I thought) minimizing work for myself I didn't want to make any
> > unncessary changes.
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mpdscribble"
* Package name: mpdscribble
Version : 0.22-3
Upstream Author : Max Kellermann
* URL : http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Client:Mpdscribble
* License : GPL-2+
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:06 AM, David Banks wrote:
> Hi Christine,
>
> On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang wrote:
>> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
>> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
>> 'mosh', which has now clear
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 666243 wishlist
Bug #666243 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: peg/0.1.7-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent
parser generators for C
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> # NEW packages should be wishlist.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I am starring at the buildd status page of mrmpi:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mrmpi
>
> I cannot make any sense of the results on armel, armhf, i386, ia64,
> mips and powerpc. Why are those arch running *-indep rules ?
They a
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:03:10PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I am starring at the buildd status page of mrmpi:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mrmpi
>
> I cannot make any sense of the results on armel, armhf, i386, ia64,
> mips and powerpc. Why are
Hi mentors,
I am starring at the buildd status page of mrmpi:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mrmpi
I cannot make any sense of the results on armel, armhf, i386, ia64,
mips and powerpc. Why are those arch running *-indep rules ?
Thanks much,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Ross Boylan writes:
>> Which, in this case, probably means running debian/rules build over and
>> over again, until you have something that works.
> I thought debian/rules build would invoke the same patch logic, but I
> tried it and it didn't. Thanks for the tip.
It won't, because unpatching
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:45:46AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> >> help2man -h "" $program will probably do the trick.
> >
> > No:
> >
> > $ help2man -h "" help2man
> > help2man: can't get `' info from help2man
>
> That happens because help2man without arguments will output to stderr.
> Add -
11 matches
Mail list logo