Dmitry Smirnov writes:
> It makes perfect sense for complete (working) test suits.
> I had an experience with valgrind only recently when upstream introduced
> yet-to-be completed tests which are failing everywhere so far.
> I'm already ignoring tests failure using override
> override_dh_auto
Hi Russ,
On Monday 27 February 2012 15:28:51 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Even with valgrind, personally I'd just list a specific set of
> architectures on which valgrind is required, even if you also
> opportunistically test for its existence. There's no reason to allow
> *not* running valgrind tests o
Dmitry Smirnov writes:
> On Monday 27 February 2012 14:09:21 Craig Small wrote:
>> Specifically to your testing, valgrind testing should probably be
>> opportunistic, so test if valgrind is available and don't otherwise. I
>> think dejagnu does it that way.
> OK, so for really optional packages
Hi Craig,
Thak you for sharing your experience.
On Monday 27 February 2012 14:09:21 Craig Small wrote:
> That's the problem I have with mudlet.
> libluajit-5.1-dev [amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-i386],
> liblua5.1-0-dev [!amd64 !armel !i386 !kfreebsd-i386],
>
Very interesting an
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Samuel Bronson , 2012-02-26, 17:49:
>>
>>> * Fix "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" warning from lintian.
>>
>> This patch...
>>
>>> * New patch 03-allow-echoing-compilation-commands.patch
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Samuel Bronson , 2012-02-26, 17:49:
>
>> * Fix "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" warning from lintian.
>
> This patch...
>
>> * New patch 03-allow-echoing-compilation-commands.patch, which enables
>> printing of compilation commands by default.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 01:42:28PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Indeed it probably could be written as
>
> Build-Depends: libgpm-dev [linux-any]
>
> But the obvious drawback would be the requirement to know all architectures
> where this package is available.
> In this case Build-Depends c
Hi Paul,
Thanks for quick reply.
On Monday 27 February 2012 13:00:32 Paul Wise wrote:
> See section 7.1 of debian-policy for examples on how to do that (you
> probably want linux-any for the arch):
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
Indeed it probably could be wri
See section 7.1 of debian-policy for examples on how to do that (you
probably want linux-any for the arch):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Dear mentors,
I have an interesting problem on my hands:
The package I need to build have optional build dependency (libgpm-dev)
which is not available on all platforms.
If I just put it to Build-Depends, package will FTBFS on some platforms.
So idea is to specify an optional (soft) build-depen
Dear mentors, dear TeX maintainers:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tth".
* Package name: tth
Version : 4.03+ds-1
Upstream Author : Ian Hutchinson
* URL :http://hutchinson.belmont.ma.us/tth/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : tex
It bui
>Hmm, yes, that can be a problem. Unfortunately, it's currently
>hardwired into the Makefile at configure time; this is likely related
>to a desire to work with a wider range of Make implementations than is
>usual?
I did that a different way (there's a macro which I normally use for most
scripts).
* Samuel Bronson , 2012-02-26, 17:49:
* Fix "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" warning from lintian.
This patch...
* New patch 03-allow-echoing-compilation-commands.patch, which enables
printing of compilation commands by default.
...and this patch have Forwarded headers pointing to gmane. Co
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Samuel Bronson , 2012-02-25, 22:43:
>>
>>> + ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
>>> dh_ commands; bump build-depends to autotools-dev (>= 20100122
> Why priority "extra"?
Sorry, my bad. I've changed it to optional.
> You build depend on "debhelper (>= 9.0.0)", but debhelper doesn't
> use such versioning scheme anymore. Even if did, "debhelper (>= 9)"
> would be both shorter and more friendly to backporters.
I didn't know that. Fixed.
> De
Hi,
have you tried contacting the MySQL maintainers (CCed)? Maybe on of
them is interested in this package.
Mateusz Kijowski writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mysql-sandbox".
>
> * Package name: mysql-sandbox
>Version : 3.0.24-1
>Upstream Author : Giusepp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 554155 with 658114
Bug #554155 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-sandbox -- manages multiple, sandboxed instances
of mysql servers on the same machine
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 554155: 658114
> block 654892 with 658032
Bug #6548
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Samuel Bronson , 2012-02-25, 22:43:
>
>> + ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
>> dh_ commands; bump build-depends to autotools-dev (>= 20100122.1)
>> accordingly. (Yes, even though it says "Do NOT" in
Hi,
"Stephen M. Webb" writes:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc
The new lintian version made me aware of another problem I had missed:
E: libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: arch-dependent-file-not-in-arch-specific-directory
usr/bin/atlas_convert
N:
N: This pac
On 02/26/2012 06:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.
I have modified the debian/copyright file as suggest
On 02/26/2012 06:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.
I have modified the debian/copyright file as suggest
Dear mentors.
A new upstream version of quickrdp is released and I have packaged it
for Debian.
I would be happy if someone would sponsor my package.
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/quickrdp
Alternatively, one
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:54:46PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The last change is from 2011-08-04. Maybe you forgot to push the
> changes?
It was neither updated nor tagged as I said. Sorry. Pushed.
--
Gabriele
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or
Benoît Knecht writes:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc
The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could
you upload it again?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 659083 + moreinfo
Bug #659083 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
659083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
tag 659083 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Stephen Kitt writes:
> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmoto/xmoto_0.5.9-1.dsc
You do not include the full license text for src/glext.h in the
copyright information.
Have the patches been forwarded upstream?
You use debhelper compat leve
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:20:46 +0100
with message-id <87y5rpptfl@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#660774: RFS: gnash/0.8.10-3~bpo60+1 [DM uploads to bpo]
has caused the Debian Bug report #660774,
regarding RFS: gnash [DM uploads to bpo]
to be marked as done.
This m
On 02/26/2012 02:34 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> it looks like gnash is no longer on mentors.d.n, probably it was removed
> because unstable has a higher version (might be a bug in debexpo).
>
> Could you make the package available somewhere else? Also consider to
> update the Git branch as well.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 658426 + moreinfo
Bug #658426 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] --
Cyrillic fonts for X
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658426: http://bugs.deb
tag 658426 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Martí writes:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
the .orig.tar.gz you used differs from the one currently in the archive:
Files:
6ef8024579061b77c835ec950dfdb8ee 871068 xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.200
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 660955 RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 [ITP] -- documentation for
> GCC 4.6
Bug #660955 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 --
documentation for GCC 4.6
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 [ITP]
Le 26/02/2012 à 14:15, Boris Pek écrivit :
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
> It is really great!
>
> Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:
>
> 1) Error "Package closes bugs in a wrong way".
>
> Your script processes wnpp pseudo-
Hi,
it looks like gnash is no longer on mentors.d.n, probably it was removed
because unstable has a higher version (might be a bug in debexpo).
Could you make the package available somewhere else? Also consider to
update the Git branch as well.
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Hi,
Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
It is really great!
Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:
1) Error "Package closes bugs in a wrong way".
Your script processes wnpp pseudo-package in wrong way.
2) Package has lintian warnings:
-
* Samuel Bronson , 2012-02-25, 22:43:
+ ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
dh_ commands; bump build-depends to autotools-dev (>= 20100122.1)
accordingly. (Yes, even though it says "Do NOT" in the autools-dev
README.Debian.gz.)
Typo: autools-dev
I have two things.
The lintian version is not up2date it doesn't know the new standard version
3.9.3
He doesn't recognise closing of itp BUG in the wnpp package, he see it as an
error.
With kind regards,
Bas van den Dikkenberg
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: onlyjob [mailto:only...@g
Dear mentors,
Could any of you share experience of having your own private build server?
I'm thinking of something which could build uploaded source for as many
architectures as possible on amd64 host, and ideally put the results to
'reprepro'-managed tree.
The goal is to simplify package dep
I just wanted to thank you sincerely for all the hard work of yours which is
so very useful for all of us.
Thank you, Arno and Nicolas! Good work.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
Fantastic, thanks very much Bernhard, I think that's the explanation we're all
needed.
Regards,
Dmitry.
On Sunday 26 February 2012 22:02:15 Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Paul Elliott [120226 02:03]:
> > The new standard allows "any all" in the Architecture field.
> >
> > Please explain this new
Hi,
"Stephen M. Webb" writes:
> On 02/12/2012 05:49 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> "Stephen M. Webb" writes:
* There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.
>> [...]
>>> I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a clause to
>>> debian/copyright for the ex
* Paul Elliott [120226 02:03]:
> The new standard allows "any all" in the Architecture field.
>
> Please explain this new feature. What does it do and under what circumstances
> should it be used?
It's for the Architecture field of the .dsc. As that field is
automatically generated, you don't "us
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler"
* Package name: task-spooler
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel
* URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/
*
43 matches
Mail list logo
