> Why priority "extra"? Sorry, my bad. I've changed it to optional.
> You build depend on "debhelper (>= 9.0.0)", but debhelper doesn't > use such versioning scheme anymore. Even if did, "debhelper (>= 9)" > would be both shorter and more friendly to backporters. I didn't know that. Fixed. > Debian Policy 3.9.3 has been just released, you probably want to > bump Standards-Version. Thanks for that advise. I dind't change that because my lintian was complaining, but surely in a near future it won't. Fixed. > Vcs-* fields are support for point to Debian packaging repository, > not upstream repository. I didn't know that either. I thought it was for any VCS. Fixed. > Unless there are good reasons (like: license issues, or tremendous > space saving), I'd advise to use the pristine upstream tarball. But > if you really must repackage, then it'd nice if: > - package had version number that indicate that the source was > repackaged (it's common to use +dfsg suffix is stuff was repackaged > for DFSG reasons, or +ds otherwise); > - you provided get-orig-source target in debian/rules. I've modified the upstream tarball in order to save space, and to avoid writing all copyright information in d/copyright. Anyway, following your advise now I'm using the pristine upstream tarball, and I've updated d/copyright. Thanks for all the advises, Jacub. For anyone who is willing to sponsor themole, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/themole/themole_0.2.6-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from: http://themole.nasel.com.ar/. Changes since the last upload: * Changed priority from extra to optional * Updates Standards-Version to 3.9.3 * Removed Vcs-* fields. * Now using pristine upstream tarball. Regards, Raúl Benencia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120226213152.ga19...@lelouch.lan