Hi Jerome,
> does someone know Debian packages using get-orig-source in d/rules ?
For example you can look at my package:
https://github.com/tehnick/libterm-shellui-perl-debian/blob/master/debian/rules
Nothing difficult. You can add any script or list of commands to get-orig-source
section of m
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tth".
* Package name: tth
Version : 4.03-1
Upstream Author : Ian Hutchinson
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/tth/
* License : GPL-2+
Section
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:32:16AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012, Olе Streicher wrote:
> > This is something I have to discuss with the upstream author (who
> > also sells the unobfuscated version). He probably would then make a
> > specific license which would allow its distrib
Hello List
On 06/02/12 15:00, Xavier Grave wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 02/02/2012 22:43, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
In short, I have to do it by hand.
You can still add a target in your debian/rules file to avoid doing it
too many times :). See [1] for explanation fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 659120 RFS: mha4mysql-manager/0.53-1 [ITP] -- Master High
> Availability Manager and Tools for MySQL
Bug #659120 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: mha4mysql-manager -- Master High
Availability Manager and Tools for MySQL [ITP]
Changed Bug titl
I finally found time to actually install the software and play a bit
with it. I have to admit that I am deeply disappointed. I spent maybe 5
minutes and I saw:
- tooltips in French;
- tooltips in German;
- dialog boxes in French;
- *lots* of error messages in French;
- an error box with no messa
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012, Olе Streicher wrote:
> This is something I have to discuss with the upstream author (who
> also sells the unobfuscated version). He probably would then make a
> specific license which would allow its distribution, but he is not
> willing to put the original source code under GP
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-clamscan".
* Package name: nautilus-clamscan
Version : 0.2.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Clement Lorteau
* URL : http://launchpad.net/nautilus-clamscan
* License : GPL-3
Section : u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 658204 RFS: bibtool [ITA] -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation
Bug #658204 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database
manipulation
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bibtool [ITA] -- tool for BibTeX database
manipulation
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mha4mysql-node".
* Package name: mha4mysql-node
Version : 0.53-1
Upstream Author : Yoshinori Matsunobu
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mysql-master-ha/
* Lic
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mha4mysql-manager".
* Package name: mha4mysql-manager
Version : 0.53-1
Upstream Author : Yoshinori Matsunobu
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mysql-master-ha/
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 14:00:36 you wrote:
> 1.1.1-1
Thanks!
--
Vincent Hobeïka
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Thank you both for your very precise remarks. I'm going to fix this.
Regarding the changelog, if I keep only one entry, I suppose I should update
the version number according to this. Should I use 1.1.1-4 or 1.1.1-1?
Again, thanks for your time and precious help.
Best regards,
--
Vincent Hobeï
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Aha, I see. In this case... well, I don't think there's a solution
> that's entirely satisfactory.
>
> The closest thing I can think of, is that one is called libfooN, while
> the other libfooN-nonfree, they conflict & replace each other, and b
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
> Gergely Nagy writes:
>> debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
>>> For example "saods9" would use slalib as a shared library, and I want to
>>> git the user a choide to run it either with the free, or with the
>>> non-free version.
>
Hi,
> As a side note I see ref to tcl8.4
which is about to be removed
Agree on this point. Please make use of version-less tcl/tcl-dev packages.
--
WBR, Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Gergely Nagy writes:
> debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
>> For example "saods9" would use slalib as a shared library, and I want to
>> git the user a choide to run it either with the free, or with the
>> non-free version.
> Are the two libraries actually ABI compatible? Somehow I
Hi everybody
I've received an email from Thomas. He proposed that it would make sense to
have not only one sponsor for my package but maybe two So if one is busy
the other one can do the sponsoring.
Thomas had no time to upload my package which I've uploaded on Januar 24th.
But he suggested to a
2012/2/7 Vincent Hobeïka :
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc
Looks good. However I would
1. Simplify d/changelog. No-one cares I did work on this package
initially. Redo d/changelog with only one entry.
2. remove quilt reference from d/rules this is u
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
> Björn Esser writes:
>> So I'd suggest name the free one slalib and the other one
>> slalib-nonfree or vice versa (like the unrar example).
>
> The problem is that I want the dependent programs to be linked against
> any of them.
>
> For example
Gergely Nagy writes:
> If it is obfuscated, then it is most probably not the preferred form of
> modification (and not the real source, but something derived from that),
> thus, them being GPL'd is invalid, and it's not even fit for non-free,
> as far as I see.
This is something I have to discuss
Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +1300
with message-id <20120208233600.4e5125fe@sidspace>
and subject line RFS: auralquiz/0.8-1 [NEW] -- simple music quiz game using
your own music files
has caused the Debian Bug report #659078,
regarding RFS: auralquiz/0.8-1 [NEW] -- simple music quiz
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
> There is another version of this library available, where the (C)
> sources are available (and put under GPL), but obfuscated, so that they
> cannot go into "main" but would have to go into "non-free". However, I
> am thinking about packaging thi
How about doing it like it's done with the unrar package:
According to packages.debian.org there are two pkgs.
unrar
unrar-free
So I'd suggest name the free one slalib and the other one
slalib-nonfree or vice versa (like the unrar example).
Cheers,
Björn
2012/2/8 Olе Streicher :
> Hi,
>
> the
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:28:03AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
Hi,
>
> I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored.
>
> Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
> it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
> it is indeed orph
Hi,
[ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ]
> libapr-memcache0 (0.7.0-3) stable; urgency=low
>
> * Switched to stable release
No, please read about the use of the different suites in Debian and how
packages migrate between them. [1] has a short description in the
second half of the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 659047 RFS: rpg/1.0.0-1 [NEW] -- Readable Password Generator
Bug #659047 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: rpg/1.0.0-1 [NEW] -- Readable Password Generator'
from 'RFS: rpg - Readable
27 matches
Mail list logo
