How about doing it like it's done with the unrar package: According to packages.debian.org there are two pkgs.
unrar unrar-free So I'd suggest name the free one slalib and the other one slalib-nonfree or vice versa (like the unrar example). Cheers, Björn 2012/2/8 Olе Streicher <debian-de...@liska.ath.cx>: > Hi, > > the library I am working on in the moment (slalib, > <http://bugs.debian.org/659003>) is an quite old Fortran library with a > C interface and some (performance) drawbacks. This library is GPL and > meets the DFSG guidelines. > > There is another version of this library available, where the (C) > sources are available (and put under GPL), but obfuscated, so that they > cannot go into "main" but would have to go into "non-free". However, I > am thinking about packaging this version as well. > > However, there would be a conflict for the library names. How would one > solve this? > > Best > > Ole > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ytzzkct1v9m....@news.ole.ath.cx > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cams3egr+jfr4_xaccnozklwppqkk5e078rwbfbmrogzxfz1...@mail.gmail.com
