Re: RFS: vodafone-mobile-broadband

2012-01-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:05:20AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Alex Chiang , 2012-01-07, 16:28: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/vodafone-mobile-broadband > > dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vodafone-mobile-broadband/vodafone-mobile-broadband_2.99.15-1.dsc > > Li

Re: RFS: boot-repair (v3.03)

2012-01-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/08/2012 09:40 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks Jakub for your review. > > I think a single source package with multiple binary packages > would make more sense. > > > i agree, but until now i didn't find how to do it Sorry, but that's not an excuse. If you didn't find out, se

Re: RFS: drwright - aka typing break in GNOME 2

2012-01-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Savvas Radevic wrote: > drwright   - Known as typing break in GNOME 2 No need to mention GNOME 2 in the short description, since the package is unrelated to GNOME 2. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ.

Re: RFS: vodafone-mobile-broadband

2012-01-07 Thread Alex Chiang
* Savvas Radevic : > > I'm looking for both reviews and a sponsor for my package > > "vodafone-mobile-broadband". > > Um.. I'm pro free speech and all, but is the programmer (and the > maintainer for that matter) allowed to use "vodafone" in a product and > avoid copyright issues? Unless it is ack

Re: RFS: vodafone-mobile-broadband

2012-01-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Alex Chiang , 2012-01-07, 16:28: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vodafone-mobile-broadband dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vodafone-mobile-broadband/vodafone-mobile-broadband_2.99.15-1.dsc Some aesthetic nitpicking: - The co

Re: RFS: vodafone-mobile-broadband

2012-01-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
> I'm looking for both reviews and a sponsor for my package > "vodafone-mobile-broadband". Um.. I'm pro free speech and all, but is the programmer (and the maintainer for that matter) allowed to use "vodafone" in a product and avoid copyright issues? Unless it is acknowledged by vodafone that is.

Re: RFS: boot-repair (v3.03)

2012-01-07 Thread yannubu...@gmail.com
Thanks Jakub for your review. I think a single source package with multiple binary packages would make > more sense. > i agree, but until now i didn't find how to do it, so it is same as dh_install: if really required, i will need someone to do it for me. > > What is python-distutils-extra buil

RFS: vodafone-mobile-broadband

2012-01-07 Thread Alex Chiang
Hello, I'm looking for both reviews and a sponsor for my package "vodafone-mobile-broadband". This is a GUI that works in conjunction with the wader-core package that was recently accepted into the archive. To get some idea of what it can do, please check out: http://postimage.org/gallery

Re: RFS: screenkey - utility to display pressed keys in screencasts

2012-01-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I still :P don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Eshat Cakar , 2012-01-07, 14:26: mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/screenkey dget: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/screenkey/screenkey_0.2-1.dsc Are the Python modules supposed to be used by external software? If th

Re: RFS: uftp

2012-01-07 Thread Frank Maker
Ok I got Lintian v2.5.4 installed and the latest packages shows me no errors when I run: lintian -i -I --show-overrides uftp_3.6.1-1_amd64.changes lintian -i -I --show-overrides uftp_3.6.1-1_amd64.deb Also, the mentors website doesn't have any warnings either: http://mentors.debia

Re: Symbols and C++ inline constructor

2012-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Weber writes: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:14:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> If it's a private symbol not intended to be used by clients and that >> wouldn't naturally be used by clients, you can mark it optional in the >> symbols file (symbol tag optional), and then the symbols genera

Re: Symbols and C++ inline constructor

2012-01-07 Thread Thomas Weber
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:14:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Thomas Weber writes: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:14:11AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > >> IIRC inline is only a hint--it's not guaranteed to > >> be inlined if the compiler thinks it's more efficient not to. > > > That is exact

RFS: engauge-digitizer

2012-01-07 Thread Tobias Winchen
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer". The package is an update for engauge-digitizer 4.1, which is already in debian. The update closes the following bugs: #604503, #556025, and #556028. I am in contact with the current maintainer, who would be glad if I t

Re: RFS: screenkey - utility to display pressed keys in screencasts

2012-01-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > - s/remove threading, to fix these/remove threading to fix these/, > - s/problems with the threading/problems with threading/. > (Though I'm not sure about the last two. Can a native speaker of English > confirm?) I confirm this. -- bye, pabs

RFS: drwright - aka typing break in GNOME 2

2012-01-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drwright". * Package name: drwright Version : 3.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Richard Hult * URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/drwright * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : gnome It builds those bin

Re: RFS: screenkey - utility to display pressed keys in screencasts

2012-01-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Eshat Cakar , 2012-01-07, 14:26: mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/screenkey dget: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/screenkey/screenkey_0.2-1.dsc In fix_threads_freeze.patch: - s/programm/program/, - s/nev/new/, - s/remove th

Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)

2012-01-07 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton: > > > The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't > > want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with > > what's in the package. I

RFS: screenkey - utility to display pressed keys in screencasts

2012-01-07 Thread Eshat Cakar
Dear Debian Developers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "screenkey". It is a screencasting tool to display the pressed keys in a very nice configurable banner on the screen. You can see it in action, in this video http://youtu.be/aLtIvEiDD2k?t=2m1s I just found one other tool in the d

Re: RFS: boot-repair (v3.03)

2012-01-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/boot-repair/boot-repair_3.03.dsc dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/boot-sav-gui/boot-sav-gui_3.03.dsc

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-07 Thread werner
Dear Mentors, I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure if the version that has been uploaded to mentors does include the /etc/default/policyd-weight file already so I've downloaded the source and i

RFS: xiterm+thai (updated)

2012-01-07 Thread Neutron Soutmun
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.10-2 (updated) of my package "xiterm+thai". It builds those binary packages: xiterm+thai - X terminal program with Thai languague support To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentor

Re: RFR: chromaprint (Adoption)

2012-01-07 Thread Simon Chopin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:53:02AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Simon Chopin , 2012-01-03, 16:38: > >>+libchromaprint.so.0 libchromaprint0 #MINVER# > >[c++ symbols] > >>It's slightly worrisome that these symbols are exported in the > >>first place. OTOH I don't know if there's a simple and > >>upst

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai

2012-01-07 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan >> wrote: >>> Hi Neutron, >>> >>> You may also versioned build-dep on dpkg-dev (>= 0.16.1~) >>> for dpkg-buildflags --expor

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai

2012-01-07 Thread Neutron Soutmun
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan > wrote: >> Hi Neutron, >> >> You may also versioned build-dep on dpkg-dev (>= 0.16.1~) >> for dpkg-buildflags --export=configure & hardening build flags. > > Thanks, I'll update in

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai

2012-01-07 Thread Neutron Soutmun
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > Hi Neutron, > > You may also versioned build-dep on dpkg-dev (>= 0.16.1~) > for dpkg-buildflags --export=configure & hardening build flags. Thanks, I'll update in the next upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ

Re: How to bring life into a (Tk) package?

2012-01-07 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:21:08 +0100 debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) wrote: > On the build side, I find the policy quite confusing: It says "Build > dependencies for Tcl/Tk dependent packages must be declared for every > Tcl/Tk version, that the package is built for. In order to bu

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai

2012-01-07 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> The package isn't particularly popular according to popcon, if you >> know people using it on Debian you might want to suggest to them that >> they install the popularity-contest package