On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:53:02AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Simon Chopin <chopin.si...@gmail.com>, 2012-01-03, 16:38: > >>+libchromaprint.so.0 libchromaprint0 #MINVER# > >[c++ symbols] > >>It's slightly worrisome that these symbols are exported in the > >>first place. OTOH I don't know if there's a simple and > >>upstreamable way to hide them. (Upstream is using cmake.) > >Yep, I've looked around to find a solution to strip all the > >template cruft, but so far the only solution I've found would be > >to do a `strip -x libchromaprint.so.0.1.4`. > > Hmm, are you sure "strip -x" helps?
After rechecking, nope, I must have dreamt it. Sorry about that. > >>But anyway, on i386 I get this lintian error: > >>E: libchromaprint0: > >>symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol > >>_ZNSt6vectorIdSaIdEE14_M_fill_insertEN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPdS1_EEjRKd@Base > >> and 2 others > >I added a specific symbol file for i386, but I fear the problem > >will also occur with other architectures. > > Of course it will. :) I just realized, I don't need to put the extra symbols in a different file since they are marked optional. Updated. But I still don't know the procedure for the other architectures. Would it be okay to upload it like this and just update the symbols file according to the buildd logs ? Cheers, Simon
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
