Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

2011-11-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-11-12 01:16, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:19:16AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > >>> I’ve also noticed that the makefile snippet exporting the hardening build >>> flags takes care of enabling optimization and handling >>> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt itself, which is nice

Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

2011-11-11 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:19:16AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > I’ve also noticed that the makefile snippet exporting the hardening build > > flags takes care of enabling optimization and handling > > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt itself, which is nice. > > Indeed, unfortunately it comes at the pric

Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

2011-11-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-11-11 11:22, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:13:04PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi >[...] >> >> If you are going to send a patch upstream anyway, you might as well make >> it possible to insert user *FLAGS after the "upstream flags". ;) > > I ended up doing just

RFS: ttysnoop

2011-11-11 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor of the package "ttysnoop". Package name: ttysnoop Version : 0.12d-5 Upstream Author : Carl Declerck URL : extinct License : GPL Section : admin It builds a single binary package: ttysnoop - a

RFS: shedskin

2011-11-11 Thread Paul Boddie
Dear mentors, (This is just a notification about another release of the package to the mentors site. This release of the package fixes a few things helpfully pointed out by Jakub Wilk. Unless people regard it as a redundant course of action, I also intend to contact the debian-python list to tr

Re: RFS: couriergrey

2011-11-11 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear mentors, On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 04:40:13PM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey". > > * Package name: couriergrey >Version : 0.2.2-1 >Upstream Author : Matthias Wimmer > * URL : http://couriergrey.com > * Lic

Re: RFS: php-pecl-http - extended HTTP support for php5

2011-11-11 Thread Mathias Ertl
Hi, On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:53:44 PM Peter Pentchev wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "php-pecl-http". I am not a Debian Developer, so I cannot upload/sponsor, but I would like to vote +1 for that packge :-). I've looked over it and found a few things: * The get-o

Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

2011-11-11 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:13:04PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> [1] Strictly speaking the CFLAGS/LDFLAGS from should "overrule" the > >> upstream ones if there are conflicts. Fixing that is left as an > >> exercise to the reader. ;) > > > > Can’t think of a way of doing that without patchin

Re: RFS: stumpwm

2011-11-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi David, David Banks writes: > Hi Desmond, > > On 07/11/11 18:05, Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stumpwm". > > I am not a DD so I can't upload your package. However I am a stumpwm > user, except I have been using the upstream git version until now > becau

Re: debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep

2011-11-11 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:19:28PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> >   I have been trying to split indep operations from

Re: RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

2011-11-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hello Michael, On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hm.  So I become curious and looked into its homepage -- > http://dwm.suckless.org/ .  And there, there's one interesting note: > >  Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s >  pointless to make binary