Hi Michael,
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:43:37 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
> > update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates,
> > which also require a switch to GTK+
Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates,
which also require a switch to GTK+ 3);
Hm, the package still build-depends on libgtk2.0-dev, is that
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates,
which also require a switch to GTK+ 3); I've also included a number of
fixes for bugs with patches in the BTS, and activated SSL
support. (See the m
Hi Chris,
[...]
> I think what I meant was that part of the social contract, if I
> understand correctly, is that we're all here to become DMs/DDs, not
> just to get our packages uploaded by someone else and walk away. So
> why is it that DDs sponsor packages and not people?
>
In the ideal case,
On 06/09/2011 09:29, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Could you please be more precise about that last bit? What exactly is hard about
becoming DM?
I really wish more people applied for DM. Sponsoring the same package more than
a few times mak
Hi all,
I solved this [1]
Now, update new version in changelog,
run svn-buildpackage and this fail,
used $ svn-buildpackage --svn-ignore
these are the errors;
1.-
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: warning: can not analyze the dependence
libobasis34-en_us-math
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: warning: can not analyze
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gkamus". this packages
already in Ubuntu archive and i suppose to Debian archive too.
* Package name: gkamus
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author: Ardhan Madras , Firmansyah
URL : http://gkamus.sourceforge.net/
Hi,
I've managed to upload eviacam again to mentors site and appears to be
lintian clean.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/eviacam
Thanks,
César
El 24/08/2011 0:25, Cesar Mauri escribió:
Hi Kilian,
Thanks for your review.
The file debian/po/templates.pot has a lot of template headers s
# find
.
./src
./src/index.php
./debian
./debian/control
./debian/rules
./debian/changelog
./debian/my-pkg.install
./debian/compat
./debian/copyright
# find -type f -exec echo '=== {} ===' \; -exec cat {} \; -exec echo
'---' \;
=== ./src/index.php ===
---
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:51:46PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> (I expect it would
> have debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as its maintainer, with
> mentors.debian.org as the pseudopackage name)
Is mentors.debian.org here suggesting that it should be added to the
official infrastructure or is this
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 04:49:59PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Also, a very useful thing (I think) would be reportbug integration.
> Thus submitters would be able to reference their existing ITP
> submission and not have to re-enter the same information in their RFS
> (this duplication has alwa
Fwd-ed to the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guido van Steen
Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Packaging php app/scripts
To: kuLa
> Ok, I created simple Makefile (content below):
> prefix := /tmp
> DESTDIR:= $(prefix)/var/www
> SRCDIR := ./src
>
> insta
> I'm concerned that this might turn out about as useful as filing an
> RFP bug against wnpp; not very useful at all.
>
Hmm, not sure - after all, people are still free to remind potential sponsors
about outstanding RFS via debian-mentors. Well, and with such a new tracking
possibility, e.g., spr
I'm concerned that this might turn out about as useful as filing an
RFP bug against wnpp; not very useful at all.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-server".
* Package name: mercurial-server
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Myself: Paul Crowley
* URL : http://www.lshift.net/mercurial-server.html
* License : GPL V2 or later
Section
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/09/11 09:03, Guido van Steen wrote:
> I forgot to cc the list:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Guido van Steen
> Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Packaging php app/scripts
> To: kuLa
>
> Hi KuLa,
>
>> I f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/09/11 09:49, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
hello
> kuLa writes:
>>
>> Content of d/control:
>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7)
>>
>> Content of d/rules:
>> override_dh_in
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 13:36, Christoph Egger wrote:
> I'm mostly fine with uploading. However I'm wondering about the
> licensing. I couldn't find any information about a license apart from a
> single file that claims to be taken from the kernel and being GPLv2 (not
> GPLv2 or later like in debi
Il giorno mar, 06/09/2011 alle 08.12 +0900, Charles Plessy ha scritto:
> Le Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> > * Michael Tautschnig , 2011-09-05, 20:51:
> > >>I've noticed that the release team has a lot of success
> > >>addressing their issues in a rather timely manner
2011/9/6 Guido van Steen
> It would be handy if you provided the contents of your package as well.
+1
Hi!
kuLa writes:
>
> Content of d/control:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7)
>
> Content of d/rules:
> override_dh_install:
> dh_install --sourcedir=src
for override targets you need debhelper >= 7.0.50~ debhelper
Le Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw a écrit :
>
> Apart from that: I haven't applied for DM yet because I still found it
> useful that someone reviews my package prior to uploading. Although
> one can also argue that that is partly the role of 'unstable'.
Dear Johan,
DM a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/09/11 09:09, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>
> Hi, Kula.
>
> I guess you should
>
> 1. list files you want to install in debian/pkg,install:
> ==
> src/script.php dest/dir/
> =
>
> 2. Use trivial debian/rules (without ov
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Could you please be more precise about that last bit? What exactly is hard
> about
> becoming DM?
>
> I really wish more people applied for DM. Sponsoring the same package more
> than
> a few times makes little sense in most cases (the
Hi, Kula.
I guess you should
1. list files you want to install in debian/pkg,install:
==
src/script.php dest/dir/
=
2. Use trivial debian/rules (without overrides):
%:; dh$@
3. Do not use ${shlibs:Depends} ;-)
I forgot to cc the list:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guido van Steen
Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: Packaging php app/scripts
To: kuLa
Hi KuLa,
> I forgot one IMHO important info there is no makefile for this project
> as php is not compilable.
How are you s
26 matches
Mail list logo
