Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-04 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hi, 2010/11/4 Iker Salmón San Millán : > first i have to rename the ITP and i've been looking how to do it but i > haven't found. Please read: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control In short, write something like this to cont...@b.d.o: retitle 1234 RFP: My package here thanks You might wan

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-04 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
I have uploaded a new package, but there are a couple of issues. first i have to rename the ITP and i've been looking how to do it but i haven't found. The second thing is that i get an error that anthony (author) can't reproduce it. The program works well but there is kind of issue with the laun

Re: RFS: dalle

2010-11-04 Thread Alberto Fernández
El jue, 04-11-2010 a las 10:11 +0100, Mònica escribió: > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 at 23:23:54, Alberto Fernández wrote: > > El mié, 03-11-2010 a las 10:55 +0100, Mònica escribió: > > > > Thanks very much for your help. > > I've just uploaded a fixed package with your suggestions. > > :-) >

Re: RFS: dalle

2010-11-04 Thread Alberto Fernández
Hi Thomas, First of all, thanks for your suggestions. El jue, 04-11-2010 a las 21:33 +0800, Thomas Goirand escribió: > On 11/03/2010 08:23 AM, Alberto Fernández wrote:Kind regards > > > Alberto Fernández > > > > Hi Alberto, > > I don't have the intention to sponsor the package, but I just w

Re: svn-buildpackage path problems with added patch

2010-11-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Daniel, please keep all the recipients in the loop, in this case -mentors was missing. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 22:48, Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi yes o.k. sorry with the German, > > I've added a patch and altered patches/series and did svn-b --svn-ignore-new. > When he tries to apply > the new

Re: svn-buildpackage path problems with added patch

2010-11-04 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi yes o.k. sorry with the German, I've added a patch and altered patches/series and did svn-b --svn-ignore-new. When he tries to apply the new patch it's simply "not found": pkg-source: info: applying hocr-header.diff dpkg-source: error: cannot read ocrodjvu-0.4.6/debian/patches/hocr-header.di

Re: Bug#602358: ITP: rtl8192ce-dkms -- Realtek RTL8192CE driver in DKMS format.

2010-11-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Reinhard Tartler writes: > is the fact that the package uses dkms relevant for the end user? it > seems as an implementation detail of the package to me, so I'd suggest > to drop that suffix. There are some things the user has to know to do to use a dkms package correctly (install the right kern

Re: Reviews by non-DDs and acknowledgements

2010-11-04 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le jeudi 4 novembre 2010 03:20:11, Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > I'm really happy to see a sizeable number of reviews of RFS'ed packages > floating in, thank you all!!! To keep this momentum and have it in a way > also documented I'd like to suggest that people uploading improved > packages also t

Re: svn-buildpackage path problems with added patch

2010-11-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 20:07, Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi people, > > I've added another .diff with quilt in debian/patches an now svn-buildpackage > breaks processing this > patch: > > > dpkg-source --before-build ocrodjvu-0.4.6 > dpkg-source: Fehler: ocrodjvu-0.4.6/debian/patches/hocr-header.di

svn-buildpackage path problems with added patch

2010-11-04 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi people, I've added another .diff with quilt in debian/patches an now svn-buildpackage breaks processing this patch: dpkg-source --before-build ocrodjvu-0.4.6 dpkg-source: Fehler: ocrodjvu-0.4.6/debian/patches/hocr-header.diff kann nicht gelesen werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden

Bug#602409: logrotate test needs to remove logrotate package and its depends too

2010-11-04 Thread Holger Levsen
package: piuparts severity: important x-debbugs-cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, mats.anders...@gisladisker.se, 566...@bugs.debian.org Hi Mats, On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > I am reading that last logging report, and I must draw this conclusion: > >* There

Re: Bug#602358: ITP: rtl8192ce-dkms -- Realtek RTL8192CE driver in DKMS format.

2010-11-04 Thread Fernando Lemos
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > is the fact that the package uses dkms relevant for the end user? it > seems as an implementation detail of the package to me, so I'd suggest > to drop that suffix. Not a good idea, seems like most (or all) DKMS packages current have the -

Re: The handling of piupart failures.

2010-11-04 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
torsdag den 4 november 2010 klockan 16:58 skrev Holger Levsen detta: > Hi Mats, > > On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > At this point only the number of packages differs: 6112 against 6113. > > All potential problems are clearly conceiled and postponed. > > I wonder i

Re: The handling of piupart failures.

2010-11-04 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear all, I can deliver at least a diagnosis to the benefit of our edification! torsdag den 4 november 2010 klockan 14:00 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta: > Dear Holger, and all readers at debian-mentors, > > a quick reply to a useful answer! > > torsdag den 4 november 2010 klockan 12:54 skre

Re: The handling of piupart failures.

2010-11-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Mats, On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > At this point only the number of packages differs: 6112 against 6113. > All potential problems are clearly conceiled and postponed. I wonder if your package (and all its depends) are installable in a empty sid chroot... > at

Build-Depends-Indep, please review

2010-11-04 Thread anatoly techtonik
Hello, I've described situation around Build-Depends-Indep at http://wiki.debian.org/Build-Depends-Indep I hope it will be useful for people who are looking for description of this field. However, I am not expert in packaging, and some information is obviously missing. If you can fill the blanks,

Second try (nobody answered first time) RFS: kstars-data-extra-tycho2

2010-11-04 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
On Sábado 18 Septiembre 2010 22:38:23 Noel David Torres Taño escribió: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kstars-data-extra-tycho2". > > * Package name: kstars-data-extra-tycho2 > Version : 1.1r1-1 > Upstream Author : Akarsh Simha, Jason Harris > * URL

Re: The handling of piupart failures.

2010-11-04 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear Holger, and all readers at debian-mentors, a quick reply to a useful answer! torsdag den 4 november 2010 klockan 12:54 skrev Holger Levsen detta: > Hi Mats, > > thanks for using piuparts to improve the quality of Debian! > > > In my particular case, the package `webfs', Piuparts reports >

Re: The handling of piupart failures.

2010-11-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Mats, thanks for using piuparts to improve the quality of Debian! On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > being a simple DM, this has not yet given me the full knowledge > to handle a failure from Piuparts. don't worry, we all learn every day. (At least I hope so ;) > I

RFS: dbxml

2010-11-04 Thread Jeroen Koekkoek
Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dbxml". * Package name: dbxml Version : 2.5.16-1 Upstream Author : Oracle * URL : http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/db/index.html * License : BSD and Apache 1.1 Section

Re: Java library license problem

2010-11-04 Thread Mònica
Hi! On Thursday 04 November 2010 at 12:17:39, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > Am 04.11.2010 12:11, schrieb Mònica: > > > This program uses a library that is not free > > (AppleJavaExtensions.jar). Apparently, the use of this library is > > only to build the MacOS version of the prog

Re: Java library license problem

2010-11-04 Thread Mònica
Hello, On Thursday 04 November 2010 at 12:15:41, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Mònica wrote: > > Hello, > > > Hello, > > > I am trying to package bluej [1], a Java program, but I think there is a > > license problem. > First have you seen the bug wa

Re: Java library license problem

2010-11-04 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 04.11.2010 12:11, schrieb Mònica: > This program uses a library that is not free > (AppleJavaExtensions.jar). Apparently, the use of this library is > only to build the MacOS version of the program. So the rest of it is free and could be part of Debian "main" if it wasn't for this libra

Re: Java library license problem

2010-11-04 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Mònica wrote: > This program uses a library that is not free (AppleJavaExtensions.jar). > Apparently, the use of this library is only to build the MacOS version of the > program. I think I could change the upstream source and achieve that the > software

Re: Java library license problem

2010-11-04 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Mònica wrote: > Hello, > Hello, > I am trying to package bluej [1], a Java program, but I think there is a > license problem. First have you seen the bug was merged with an other ITP [2] where more discussion are in progress. > This program uses a lib

The handling of piupart failures.

2010-11-04 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear all, being a simple DM, this has not yet given me the full knowledge to handle a failure from Piuparts. In my particular case, the package `webfs', Piuparts reports unowned leftovers, like /etc/adduser.conf /etc/crontab /lib/libpopt.so.0 /usr/share/bug/logrotate and a multi

Java library license problem

2010-11-04 Thread Mònica
Hello, I am trying to package bluej [1], a Java program, but I think there is a license problem. This program uses a library that is not free (AppleJavaExtensions.jar). Apparently, the use of this library is only to build the MacOS version of the program. I think I could change the upstream so

Re: RFS: sciteproj

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:15:58 +0100 Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > [...] > > > I have done another upload, version 0.3.15 - > > I hadn't updated the version number in the man-page I provide, and some > > minor GTK updates (added -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED, and fixed the minor > > pro

Re: RFS: sciteproj

2010-11-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Andreas, [...] > > > > I have fixed these items in a new upload to mentors, and mailed Michael > > Vogt with links to the RFS and this thread. > > > > best regards > > -- > > Andreas Rönnquist > > > > > > I have done another upload, version 0.3.15 - > I hadn't updated the version numbe

Re: Using Quilt with a new package

2010-11-04 Thread Daniel Lombraña González
Hi everyone, Thanks for all your help. I think that right now the easiest way for me is to handle the modifications by hand as they are not very difficult to manage (just comment out one line in the SQL file). Neverthless, what I wanted is to do this automatically for me :). I will try it again wi

Re: RFS: minidlna

2010-11-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Benoît, [...] > > I just uploaded a new version (1.0.18-3) [1] that addresses all the > issues you've pointed out to me (except the missing license headers, > I'll ask upstream about that). > > I hope I didn't miss anything, but please let me know if there are any > problems left. > I've s

Re: RFS: dalle

2010-11-04 Thread Mònica
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 at 23:23:54, Alberto Fernández wrote: > El mié, 03-11-2010 a las 10:55 +0100, Mònica escribió: > > Thanks very much for your help. > I've just uploaded a fixed package with your suggestions. :-) > > I'm not a DD, but here's my review for your package: > > The review

Reviews by non-DDs and acknowledgements

2010-11-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi all, I'm really happy to see a sizeable number of reviews of RFS'ed packages floating in, thank you all!!! To keep this momentum and have it in a way also documented I'd like to suggest that people uploading improved packages also thank their non-DD reviewers (for DDs I consider doing reviews p

Re: package transition question

2010-11-04 Thread Harald Jenny
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:13:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM, The Fungi wrote: > > > Alternatives would be (more user friendly) come up with a > > configuration translator if all existing options can have a 1-to-1 > > transform/mapping to new options or syntax, > >

Re: package transition question

2010-11-04 Thread Harald Jenny
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:26:00PM +, The Fungi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 11:59:27AM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > [...] > > Our current idea is to do the installation, run the program in > > postinst to check for config errors and if we find some we issue a > > warning message and cease