On 2010-07-15 19:17, Michael Diers wrote:
> On 2010-07-15 07:58, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:24:01PM +0200, Michael Diers wrote:
>>> Dear mentors and backporters,
>>>
>>> here's another attempt at soliciting sponsorship for my update to the
>>> Subversion package in lenny-back
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:49:10PM -0600, Lloyd Standish wrote:
> I looked at zenity. From the man page which describes the command line
> options, I don't think it is capable of a complex dialog with different types
> of input fields and action buttons, all available in the same multi-tabbed
>
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:21:26 +0300, Eugene Paskevich
wrote:
Might be a good idea to make upstream more flexible and only hide
stuff if a certain environment variable is set. In any case your patch
makes the system print ugly stuff like this:
ESC[KESC[0;33mGenerating
dependencies...ESC[0m^MES
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:36:46 +0300, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Eugene Paskevich
wrote:
As you started reviewing this package does it mean that
I have found a sponsor and now should note appropriately in m.d.n?
No. Since I'm at DebConf I have some time to review pac
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:10 PM, David Banks wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sisc".
I have some questions / notes:
- Is there a reason for not putting the jar files into /usr/share/java
to comply to the Debian java policy?
- May you split the changes to the upstrea
Osamu Aoki writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> Breaks field was added to policy in 3.8 and current stable dpkg supports
> it as I understand. So we are ready to use it, as I understand.
>
> Under this new situation, I would like to confirm what is the best
> practice for each case scenario. Please comment
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:47:48PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chris Baines wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 05:52 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Chris B
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
> As you started reviewing this package does it mean that
> I have found a sponsor and now should note appropriately in m.d.n?
No. Since I'm at DebConf I have some time to review packages, but not
nessecarily enough time for ongoing sponso
"Bernhard R. Link" writes:
> Not answering the Conflics/Breaks issue, but some remark about Provides.
>
> * Osamu Aoki [100726 17:27]:
>> =
>> Case 2: package transition rule
>> All the contents of the package foo is inc
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:47:48PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chris Baines wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 05:52 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Matt Zagr
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 02:36 +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:11:47 +0300, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Why did you drop this line from debian/rules?
> >
> > rm -f config.sub config.guess
>
> I'm not sure why they are there to begin with.
> These files are in orig tarball and ar
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:48:16PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki [100726 17:27]:
> > =
> > Case 2: package transition rule
> > All the contents of the package foo is incorporated by bar in new 1.0
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
> > =
> > Case 1: only one package rule
...
Thanks.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "greasefire".
* Package name: greasefire
Version : 1.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Steve Krulewitz
* URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8352/
* License
14 matches
Mail list logo
