Hi, On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> writes: > > ============================================================================= > > Case 1: only one package rule ... Thanks.
> > ============================================================================= > > Case 2: package transition rule ... Thanks. > > Do we need ( << 1.0 ) for replaces? > > You don't strictly need it, but I think it's cleaner, since it catches > mistakes (such as not properly removing the transitioned files from foo). Good to know. > > ============================================================================= > > Case 2': package transition rule > > After stable release with case 2, you wish to remove the transitional > > package foo upon upgrade to unstable/testing/next-stable. I guess we do > > not package "Package: foo" at this moment when uploading. > > > Question: Is there sure way to purge the old transitional package foo? > > I'm dubious that even attempting to do this is a good idea. I wouldn't > bother. OK. After good night sleep with your comment, it is not worth it. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100728122659.ga4...@debian.org
