Re: RFS: tivion (updated package)

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Angel Guzman Maeso wrote: > Could you check it again? I didn't check it the first time, but the version number looks fine now. Next time I do a review run I'll see if I can include it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: RFS: tivion (updated package)

Hi Paul, I upload again the package http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tivion/ Could you check it again? Regards. 2010/5/16 Paul Wise > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Angel Guzman Maeso > wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponso

RFS: projectm (ping)

Hello! I'm still looking for someone interested in reviewing & sponsoring my packaging of projectM. Package details: * Package name: projectm Version : 2.0.1-1 Upstream Author : projectM Team * URL : http://projectm.sf.net * License : GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 Sect

po file and git (or any merge)

Hi, If you translate with po files, what kind of merge/rebase strategy should we use? Does any one know best hook script to automation of merging with msgmerge? Simple git merge is too much manual fix. Is there good way to run $ msgmerge ... While we run merge/rebase Pointer to doc and scri

Re: Please review internal package using a lot of "new" tools

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:21:17PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:53:54AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:29AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Marc Haber > > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:12

Re: RFS: dirsum

Hi, jaromil writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dirsum". There was some discussion [1] on debian-de...@l.d.o what dirsum offers that du and sort do not. You might have missed it if you are not subscribed to the list. Regards, Ansgar [1]

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-qxl

On Monday 24 May 2010 21:08:50 Julien Cristau wrote: > > Uploaded, thanks. Thanks, > > Not quite sure how to deal with the 3.0 (quilt) sillyness of deleting > the autogen.sh script and moving it to > debian/patches/debian-changes-0.0.12-1 during the build (the script is > in upstream git, but n

Re: RFS: gedit-r-plugin

Hi, Thanks for comments and suggestions. All mentioned issues fixed * removed not necessary files (debian/format) * removed not necessary second entry from changelog * removed dependency on cdbs * Readme.Debian merged with copyright * removed dh_pysupport (not needed for this plugin) * installed

RFS: dirsum

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dirsum". * Package name : dirsum Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Dirk Bartley * Url : ftp://ftp.dyne.org/dirsum * License : GPL-2 Section : misc It builds this binary package: dirsum - ex

Re: Please review internal package using a lot of "new" tools

Hi, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:53:54AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:29AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Marc Haber > > wrote: > > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:12:40AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I have uploaded a new package to > h

Re: RFS: gedit-r-plugin

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:42, Mateusz Kaduk wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gedit-r-plugin". Here are some comments: debian/changelog: - remove -2 entry: the changelog is about the change you did from an upload to Debian archive to the previous, since it'

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-qxl

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:05:36 +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > On Friday 21 May 2010 04:08:53 Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > You're calling dh_prep in debian/rules clean, this is wrong, should be > > replaced by dh_clean. dh_prep is used in the install target before > > running make install, and obso

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

On 24/5/2010 14:31, Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > Dne Mon, 24 May 2010 13:32:12 +0300 > Nanakos Chrysostomos napsal(a): > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.11-3 > > of my package "mpg321". > > > It builds these binary packages: > > mpg321 - Simple and lighweight command lin

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:06:40 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > > > When I released the previous version I was contacted by a DD offering to > > sponsor roxterm and help me become a DM, but when I told him George > > Danchev had already uploaded it he said I didn't need his

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 24 May 2010 13:55:01 +0200 Sandro Tosi napsal(a): > I saw you sponsored mpg321. I didn't see a reply here, so I just > report what i've found now. I sent an reply just before uploading the package, probably delayed because of greylisting on liszt.debian.org. > Closing bugs in debia

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 24 May 2010 13:32:12 +0300 Nanakos Chrysostomos napsal(a): > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.11-3 > of my package "mpg321". > > It builds these binary packages: > mpg321 - Simple and lighweight command line MP3 pl

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

Hi Michal, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 13:38, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:32, Nanakos Chrysostomos > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.11-3 >> of my package "mpg321". > > Giving

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:32, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.11-3 > of my package "mpg321". Giving it a look. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My web

Re: RFS: sqlitebrowser (updated package)

Am Montag, 24. Mai 2010, 12:03:15 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: > Why not use 2.0~b1-1 as a version number? It is easier to understand and > still sorts before a stable 2.0-1 release. Don’t know, I read it somewhere, but can’t remember where. There are so many places with different information in the

RFS: fookebox

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fookebox". * Package name: fookebox Version : 0.4.2-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Ott * URL : http://fookebox.googlecode.com/ * License : GNU GPL Section : web It builds these binary packages: fookeb

Re: Preventing init script start during package install

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:26, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:54:35PM +0300, Zaar Hai wrote: >> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Marc Haber >> wrote: >> > If you have dh_installinit, use --noscripts and have a good reason >> > for not starting the service automatically. >

RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.11-3 of my package "mpg321". It builds these binary packages: mpg321 - Simple and lighweight command line MP3 player The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix

Re: RFS: sqlitebrowser (updated package)

Quoting "Stefan Haller" : Dear mentors, I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream release. The latest release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian version number. The package uses now the the new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, so I’ve changed many files

Re: RFS: sqlitebrowser (updated package)

Hi, [ CCed sqlitebrowser's maintainer ] Stefan Haller writes: > I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream > release. The latest release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen > “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian version number. The package uses now the the > new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, s

RFS: sqlitebrowser (updated package)

Dear mentors, I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream release. The latest release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian version number. The package uses now the the new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, so I’ve changed many files in the debian/-directory. (I hop

Re: Preventing init script start during package install

Hi, On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:54:35PM +0300, Zaar Hai wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > If you have dh_installinit, use --noscripts and have a good reason > > for not starting the service automatically. > Thanks! I'll try that out (looks like I'll need to some CD

Re: Please review internal package using a lot of "new" tools

Hi, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:29AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:12:40AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > >> In dh_auto_install, does upstream's Makefile not support DESTDIR? > > > > Sadly, incorrectly. > > make install