RFS: drbdlinks (updated package, 2nd try)

2010-04-09 Thread Thierry Randrianiriana
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drbdlinks". * Package name: drbdlinks Version : 1.18-1 Upstream Author : Sean Reifschneider * URL : http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/drbdlinks/ * License : GPL2 Section : admin It builds t

RFS: gts (updated package, 2nd try)

2010-04-09 Thread Ruben Molina
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.6+darcs100321-1 of my package "gts". It builds these binary packages: libgts-0.7-5 - library to deal with 3D computational surface meshes libgts-bin - utility binaries for libgts libgts-dbg - debugging symbols for libgts libgts-dev

RFS: scidavis (updated package, 2nd try)

2010-04-09 Thread Ruben Molina
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-1 of my package "scidavis". It builds these binary packages: scidavis - application for scientific data analysis and visualization The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: RFS: evilvte (updated package)

2010-04-09 Thread Wen-Yen Chuang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > Note: bug #576624 is vte's bug, not evilvte's. > > evilvte (0.4.6-1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * New upstream release > - avoid an severe VTE bug in version 0.24.0, please see #576624 > > PS: When you test the binary, if

Re: RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) (fix RC bug)

2010-04-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" , 2010-04-10, 00:58: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-2 of my package "aircrack-ng". Are you sure that src/osdep/radiotap/radiotap-parser.c is the only place where #include is missing? -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) (fix RC bug)

2010-04-09 Thread Tim Retout
On 9 April 2010 23:58, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: > Subject: RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-2 > of my package "aircrack-ng". It's good that this will fix an RC bug. However, I notice that the PTS links to a securi

RFS: ink (updated package)

2010-04-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.1-1 of my package "ink". It builds these binary packages: ink- tool for checking the ink level of your local printer The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://m

RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) (fix RC bug)

2010-04-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Subject: RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-2 of my package "aircrack-ng". It builds these binary packages: aircrack-ng - wireless WEP/WPA cracking utilities The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these

Re: RFS: httpry

2010-04-09 Thread Tim Retout
On 9 April 2010 15:36, Yann Lejeune wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "httpry". This is the second > call for sponsorship (firt was in last august). I've updated the package > since the previous upload on the mentors website (minor fixes). I've read through the

Re: RFS: windowlab (updated package)

2010-04-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Mats Erik Andersson writes: > Yes. Performing that wildcard replacement for all targets, would > erase my efforts to set a priority for the window manager ranking, > thus setting it to an improperly low value instead of the chosen 40. > On the other hand, I am still reluctant to implement a debh

Re: RFS: httpry

2010-04-09 Thread Tim Retout
On 9 April 2010 22:35, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > Lastly, it is probably better to revert to the initial version '0.1.5-1', > since otherwise the closing of the ITP-bug would be lost. The only text > needed in the changelog would then be > >   * Initial release. (Closes: #539665) > > together wi

Re: RFS: httpry

2010-04-09 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Hello, without being in any position to promote this package, let me express my observations. fredag den 9 april 2010 klockan 16:36 skrev Yann Lejeune detta: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "httpry". This is the second > call for sponsorship (firt was in last augus

Re: RFS: windowlab (updated package)

2010-04-09 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Hello, fredag den 9 april 2010 klockan 21:06 skrev Christoph Egger detta: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.40-1 > > of my package "windowlab". > > > > The upload would fix the bug 57

Re: RFS: windowlab (updated package)

2010-04-09 Thread Christoph Egger
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.40-1 > of my package "windowlab". > > It builds these binary packages: > windowlab - small and simple Amiga-like window manager > > The package appears to be

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper (still confused)

2010-04-09 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > Le jeudi 08 avril 2010, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > I do not know active use of binary-indep by itself. Anyone knows? > > (I know some makefile has binary: binary-indep binary-arch.) > > I do not know what you mean by “active use”

RFS: windowlab (updated package)

2010-04-09 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.40-1 of my package "windowlab". It builds these binary packages: windowlab - small and simple Amiga-like window manager The package appears to be lintian clean and builds well using pbuilder. The upload would fix the bug 575793. Th

RFS: httpry

2010-04-09 Thread Yann Lejeune
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "httpry". This is the second call for sponsorship (firt was in last august). I've updated the package since the previous upload on the mentors website (minor fixes). * Package name: httpry Version : 0.1.5-2 Upstream Author :

Re: RFS: emerillon

2010-04-09 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:15:41AM -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > Le vendredi 09 avril 2010 à 08:17 +0200, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : [...] > > I do understand that you might want to easily be able to build local > > test versions straight from git for your testing, but these should IMHO

Re: RFS: emerillon

2010-04-09 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Le vendredi 09 avril 2010 à 08:17 +0200, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : > On tor, 2010-04-08 at 22:10 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > [...] > > Keeping in mind the (off-topic) discussion on bug 575384, the > > rationale for having this retrieved from git is that it simplifies (at > > least fo

Re: RFS: emerillon

2010-04-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:10 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre a écrit : > * Package name: emerillon > Version : 0.1.1-1 > Upstream Author : Novopia Solutions Inc. > * URL : http://www.novopia.com/emerillon/ > * License : GPL > Section : utils > > It bu

Re: RFS: emerillon

2010-04-09 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 09:41:06AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:48:25AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > > > > This package fails to build wether on Debian unstable or on Lucid. > > Buildlogs are attached. > > Probably because of GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED being defined

Re: RFS: emerillon

2010-04-09 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:48:25AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > > This package fails to build wether on Debian unstable or on Lucid. > Buildlogs are attached. Probably because of GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED being defined... ./configure --enable-deprecations=no This should be one of the differences