On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, xiangfu wrote:
> Hi
> I want to be a New Maintainer, so I follow "Debian New Maintainers' Guide "
> but when a use "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot"
Please use debian-mentors@lists.debian.org for your packaging questions.
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: must specify package since c
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Theppitak
Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> Given the unmodified version of the license, and with the
> assumption that all modification and redistribution is on
> postcardware basis, could debian-legal people re-evaluate
> the license for non-free upload?
>
> The license t
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Dave Kerr wrote:
> I have recently added a sponsorship entry for it here:
> http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=480
I don't think anyone uses that site any more.
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kabikaboo/kabikaboo_1.1.1.dsc
First problem: p
On 23 Jun 2009, at 19:14, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Harry Rickards , 2009-06-23, 16:39:
tvim that acts as a wrapper for gvim and allows you to open files
remotely.
How is it better than the netrw plugin?
I thought netrw just allowed you to edit remote files in a local
editor, not in a remote e
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:02:16PM +0200, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
> > >
> > > The package appears to be lintian clean.
> >
> > No, it's not.
> >
> > W: php-xml-util source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is
> > 3.8.2)
> >
>
> My fault, i just pasted the template suggested
* Harry Rickards , 2009-06-23, 16:39:
tvim that acts as a wrapper for gvim and allows you to open files
remotely.
How is it better than the netrw plugin?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
> >
> > The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> No, it's not.
>
> W: php-xml-util source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.2)
>
My fault, i just pasted the template suggested by the "My packages" area
at mentors.debian.net without checking it. As you can see at [1], the
IANADD, but...
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:50:47PM +0200, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.4-3
> of my package "php-xml-util".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> php-xml-util - a XML utility for php-pear
>
> The package appears to be lintian c
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Unfortunately this is a package of a package that does not use deb done by
> someone else so I have to do the thinking for it. If ia32-libs is not
> present on a 64 bit system the install simply fails with an unrelated error
> message. I would rather not have two separate pa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-1 of my package "usb-
modeswitch".
It builds these binary packages:
usb-modeswitch - mode switching tool for controlling "flip flop" USB devices
The package is binary and source lintian clean up to two --pedantic tags I
consider
Unfortunately this is a package of a package that does not use deb done by
someone else so I have to do the thinking for it. If ia32-libs is not
present on a 64 bit system the install simply fails with an unrelated error
message. I would rather not have two separate packages for i386 and amd64 if
I
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.4-3
of my package "php-xml-util".
It builds these binary packages:
php-xml-util - a XML utility for php-pear
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 529694
The package can be found on mentors.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/23/09 14:26, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> On 2009-06-23 12:24:09.00 Harry Rickards wrote:
>> It's not actually my program, it's just a useful tool I found on
>> Sourceforge. What would you suggest packaging it as? utils?
>
> spam would be the perf
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a deb package that requires ia32-libs to run on a 64-bit
> Debian/Ubuntu, otherwise it works without it on i386. I have tried in
> the control file:
>
> Depends: ia32-libs [amd64]
>
> But that doesn't seem valid. How does one specify ia32-libs should be
Hi all,
I have a deb package that requires ia32-libs to run on a 64-bit
Debian/Ubuntu, otherwise it works without it on i386. I have tried in
the control file:
Depends: ia32-libs [amd64]
But that doesn't seem valid. How does one specify ia32-libs should be
a dependency when on 64 bit?
Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
* URL : http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pem-0.7.3.tar.gz
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for packaging Pem!
Some points from your mail,
1. Provide full description of package with your RFS.
2. URL show version 0.7.3 while you packaged version 0.7.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.7.beta-14
of my package "sniffit".
It builds these binary packages:
sniffit - packet sniffer and monitoring tool
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 532581
The package can be found on ment
On Tuesday 23,June,2009 07:51 PM, Carsten Aulbert wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> It's a bit daring, but the following might work:
>>
>> DEB_CONFIGURE_INVOKE := . opt/foo/bar.sh ; $(DEB_CONFIGURE_INVOKE)
>>
>>
> I need to add to daringness (Since LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to
Hi Peter,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> It's a bit daring, but the following might work:
>
> DEB_CONFIGURE_INVOKE := . opt/foo/bar.sh ; $(DEB_CONFIGURE_INVOKE)
>
I need to add to daringness (Since LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to be added to
as well at make time):
DEB_MAKE_INVOKE := . opt/foo/bar.sh ;
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pem".
* Package name: pem
Version : 0.7.6-1
Upstream Author : Prasad Pandit
* URL : http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pem-0.7.3.tar.gz
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds these binary packag
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "frescobaldi".
* Package name: frescobaldi
Version : 0.7.11-1
Upstream Author : Wilbert Berendsen lily...@xs4all.nl
* URL : www.frescobaldi.org
* License : GPL
Section : kde
It builds these bina
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 08:22:17 Carsten Aulbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as suggested on debian-user I repost my question here (sorry for the
> cross post, but I think it's better than send to individual emails to
> both lists, feel free to remove the other list)
>
> I'm currently packaging some "internal
Dear all,
i have already developed the new version according the bug's list and
the TODO list. This version is very stable and its the 0.2.11.
Yes i would like and could be the new upstream author. I cant find also
Joe Drew and Stephen Depooter for a long time now.
Elías A. M. wrote:
Chrysost
Joachim Reichel wrote:
Loic: I'm happy to sponsor this upload if you can get the data loss bug
fixed. There might be some small changes to the packaging needed, but
I'm confident that these can be easily sorted out.
I haven't been able to reproduce this bug once. I tried with raw images
smalle
24 matches
Mail list logo
