Hi Paul,
I've uploaded a new package which should address your packaging concerns.[1]
I find a symbols file a bit overkill for a library which is not going to
be developed any further in the forseeable future, but I've added one
anyway. - You've pointed out a few things I might discuss with upstre
In <7337540c0905160100g59c1a3dem9f7622da6ca42...@mail.gmail.com>, Ludovico
Cavedon wrote:
>I think I'll go for
>2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1
Just, IMO:
I prefer 2.2~rc3+hg365~dfsg1 so that 2.2~rc3+hg365 would be greater than it.
In this way, it would allow distribution of the same upstream without
repa
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:33:07AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:50:10 -0300
> Rogério Brito wrote:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "foo".
>
> [Include one of:]
> >
> problems.>
> .>
>
> [or some other description of the kind of upl
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:48:12 +0200
Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scrotwm".
>
> * Package name: scrotwm
> Version : 0.9.2
> Upstream Author : Marco Peereeboom
> * URL : http://www.peereeboom.us/scrotwm/html/scr
Hi all
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I asked Alexey if that would be possible. I hope the point's can be
> solved by using icons known to be in the public domain. So I have to
> wait for his reply on this.
Short note, Alexey had now most of the icons rep
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Don Armstrong (Thu, 14 May 2009 13:24:29 -0700):
> > a message to control with 'close ' (deprecated, because it doesn't
> > tell the submitter that it was fixed, [...])
> Well, AFAIK they do get a mail that the bug has been closed, with
> subject
Hello,
> > fakeroot debian/rules clean
> > # do not abort if quilt pop fails (this is usually if there no
> > patches applied
> > quilt pop -a || true
> > No patch removed
> > quilt push 10_addBuildInfrastructure
> > No patches in series
>
> You p
Hi,
Benjamin Mesing writes:
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> # do not abort if quilt pop fails (this is usually if there no
> patches applied
> quilt pop -a || true
> No patch removed
> quilt push 10_addBuildInfrastructure
> No patches in series
Hello,
I have a package which builds just fine when running debuild. It also
works fine, taking the source files created by debuild run "dpkg-soruce
-x" and then debuild in the resulting directory. However, I am unable to
pdebuild the package from the same directory where debuild works
perfectly.
> Start with the unpatched upstream source.
> Copy the debian dir in including debian/patches/.
> echo "3.0 (quilt)" >debian/source/format
> remove patch system from debian/rules if present
> debuild
Thanks for the pointer. However, since the archive does not support
Format 3.0 (quilt) yet, I wil
[Neil Williams, 2009-05-17]
> RFS: QA:
> RFS: NEW:
> RFS: RC:
I like this. I'd add , though (see below)
> RFS: UPDATE:
I ask my sponsorees to add a version in Subject field as well, this way
I know if it's new upstream release or an update (so UPDATE tag is not
needed) and I can distinguish
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:50:10 -0300
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "foo".
[Include one of:]
>
problems.>
.>
[or some other description of the kind of upload required]
Alternatively (or possibly additionally), some reliable method of
encoding
I have created a package that during the build processes uses the
hunspell-tools munch utility to generate the dictionary file and on
install install the required files for the dictionary as per dictionary
policy. I am, however, not a Debian Developer and the package has a
strict build depends on
[Please don't top-post. Instead, remove quoted material that you're
not replying to, and reply inline to the points you're responding to.]
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:08:29AM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> I hope this doesn't seem harsh ;) But in my experience, it works the
> best at start to
14 matches
Mail list logo
