Re: RFS: ljcrop

Darren Salt wrote: The package would be lintian-clean but for what I think is a false positive. lintian (in testing) complains about a dependency on wish, but that can't be right: Depends: wish | tk8.5, libtk-img, libjpeg-progs http://lintian.debian.org/tags/virtual-package-depends-without-re

RFS: ljcrop

I'm looking for a sponsor for ljcrop, a graphical front end for the JPEG-cropping functionality of jpegtran. (This would close ITP bug 521315.) The package would be lintian-clean but for what I think is a false positive. lintian (in testing) complains about a dependency on wish, but that can't be

Re: RFS: gnview

Hi, On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:10 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Is it all GPLv2 ? Now it's all GPLv2 clean code, author and I check some stuff and change its code or get approvement from original code maintainer. For more detail, see http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnview/gnview

Re: /doc and/or manpage

Le Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:46:32PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea a écrit : > > dh_installman -prumor Therefore the answer to your question is in the manual page of dh_installman. More in general, if you include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk in debian/rules, then most debhelper programs will be

Emails mala direta por email do Brasil listas de emails

Mais detalhes em: http://www.maladiretaemails.com Emails mala direta e-mails mala direta, listas para mala direta divulgação e marketing marketing digital por email, cadastro em site de busca cadastro em sites de busca, envio em massa divulgacao de sites, e-mail divulgação em sites de busca, li

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-auth-cas

Michele Baldessari wrote: > Hi Luk, > > On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 07:43 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Michele Baldessari wrote: >>> So I removed the postinst change and changed dh_fixperms appropriately >>> in trunk. Thanks for noticing and let me know if you'd like me to upload >>> a 1.0.8-2 to mentors.

Re: "out of date on mips: siege (from 2.66-2)"

On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:53:53AM +0100, Tristan Greaves wrote: > Hi all, > > Could someone please explain the above Excuse for me? (I understand the > _what_ but not the _why_ in this instance). > > https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=siege > > My package has successfully built on the

RFS: siege (updated package, diffs majorly slimmed down)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.68b7-1 of my package "siege". It builds these binary packages: siege - HTTP regression testing and benchmarking utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://men

"out of date on mips: siege (from 2.66-2)"

Hi all, Could someone please explain the above Excuse for me? (I understand the _what_ but not the _why_ in this instance). https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=siege My package has successfully built on the other architectures, but the process does not seem to have run on mips. The