Re: How handle Architecture when package is restricted/limited to only some archs?

2009-02-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Don Thanks for the fast reply. On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 11:51:08PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > tuxcmd is currently by upsteam "restricted" to the Architectures i386 > > and x86_64. [1]. As suggested in a previous thread I had put > >

Re: How handle Architecture when package is restricted/limited to only some archs?

2009-02-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > tuxcmd is currently by upsteam "restricted" to the Architectures i386 > and x86_64. [1]. As suggested in a previous thread I had put > > Architecture: any > > in the control file, and now I'm having the following situation: On > powe

How handle Architecture when package is restricted/limited to only some archs?

2009-02-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi tuxcmd is currently by upsteam "restricted" to the Architectures i386 and x86_64. [1]. As suggested in a previous thread I had put Architecture: any in the control file, and now I'm having the following situation: On powerpc all Build-Depends are satisfied, and also the packa

RFS: libschedule-cron-perl (updated package)

2009-02-01 Thread Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.97-1 of my ITA package "libschedule-cron-perl". It builds these binary packages: libschedule-cron-perl - Simple but complete cron like scheduler The package appears to be lintian clean.

Re: RFS: gmusicbrowser

2009-02-01 Thread Antonio Radici
Ben Finney wrote: It would help prospective sponsors of this package to know why it should be included in Debian; that is, what benefits it gives to a user such that they would prefer it over all the other music browsers in Debian. Fortunately, you have a good place to put that information: the

Re: RFS: gmusicbrowser

2009-02-01 Thread Ben Finney
Antonio Radici writes: > It builds these binary packages: > gmusicbrowser - graphic jukebox for large collections of mp3/ogg/flac/mpc > files It would help prospective sponsors of this package to know why it should be included in Debian; that is, what benefits it gives to a user such that they

Re: RFS: gmusicbrowser

2009-02-01 Thread Antonio Radici
Antonio Radici wrote: Antonio Radici wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gmusicbrowser". * Package name: gmusicbrowser Hi, unfortunately the package is not ready yet, sorry for the early email :-( Ready now! Thanks for your patience :-) Cheers Antonio --

Re: RFS: gmusicbrowser

2009-02-01 Thread Antonio Radici
Antonio Radici wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gmusicbrowser". * Package name: gmusicbrowser Hi, unfortunately the package is not ready yet, sorry for the early email :-( Cheers Antonio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

RFS: gmusicbrowser

2009-02-01 Thread Antonio Radici
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gmusicbrowser". * Package name: gmusicbrowser Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Quentin Sculo * URL : http://squentin.free.fr/gmusicbrowser/gmusicbrowser.html * License : GPLv3 Section : sou

Re: RFS: artha

2009-02-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, 2 classic comments just reading your RFS On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 22:09, Sundaram wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "artha". it's a new package, but no ITP closed with this upload: please check debian policy, developers reference and google to find out wha

RFS: artha

2009-02-01 Thread Sundaram
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "artha". * Package name: artha Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Sundaram Ramaswamy * URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/artha * License : GPL v2 Section : utils It builds these binary

Re: RFS: libdata-compare-perl (updated package)

2009-02-01 Thread David Bremner
At Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:04 -0430, Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > You might consider joining the debian perl team, http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org It is never a problem finding someone to upload packages from the team

Re: Licensecheck returns UNKOWN, but it's GPL

2009-02-01 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/1/31 Ben Finney : > If you can come up with a reproducible test case for 'licensecheck' > not behaving as it should, submit it as a bug report. I'm sure on my system it doesn't check files with names ending in '.h' In an empty dir do: $ touch lc.h && touch lc.c $ licensecheck * it returns l

Re: RFS: usepackage (updated package),,Dear mentors,

2009-02-01 Thread Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise escribió: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto > wrote: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usepackage/usepackage_1.8-2.dsc > > Switching to cdbs is not appropriate during the testing release free

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.28

2009-02-01 Thread Reijo Tomperi
Reijo Tomperi wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck". * Package name: cppcheck Version : 1.25-1 Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki Reijo Tomperi * URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/ * License : GP