RFS: teseq

2008-08-06 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "teseq". * Package name: teseq Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/teseq/ * License : GPLv3+ Section : devel It builds these b

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Thibaut GIRKA
> > You seem to be missing Ľubomír Remák from src/plugins/gajim/__init__.py > > Correction: you are misspelling his/her name. Huh, I copied his nick, not his name, sorry. Best regards, Thibaut GIRKA. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

RFS: trac (updated package)

2008-08-06 Thread Luis Matos
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.11.1-1 of my package "trac". It builds these binary packages: trac - Enhanced wiki and issue tracking system for software development The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 400774, 435321, 43

Same file in two packages

2008-08-06 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
Dear mentors: File /usr/share/icons/wmaker-GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker-data I've recently adopted and file /usr/share/WindowMaker/Icons/GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker are exactly the same, bit by bit. Since wmaker suggests wmaker-data and wmaker-data suggests wmaker, what should I do? not

Teco Industry is in the business of corn, wheat, paddy, and

2008-08-06 Thread TECO DRYER
vegetable dr Sender: "TECO DRYER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:09:04 +0300 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Teco Industry is in the business of

Re: Bug#491858: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

2008-08-06 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi, Le Wednesday 06 August 2008 23:31:32 Cyril Brulebois, vous avez écrit : > Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2008): > > Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to > > review this package. > > Okay, here we go for a first round: > - No need to mention the upst

Re: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

2008-08-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2008): > Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to > review this package. Okay, here we go for a first round: - No need to mention the upstream release number in your first changelog entry, although it does no harm. - You d

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You seem to be missing Ľubomír Remák from src/plugins/gajim/__init__.py Correction: you are misspelling his/her name. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Thibaut GIRKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Just noticed that the copyright file is missing information for one of >> the .po files and at least one of the python files, please check all the >> files for differing copyright information and document them in >> debia

Re: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

2008-08-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/08/2008): > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1 > of package "jzlib". Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to review this package. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Thibaut GIRKA
> Just noticed that the copyright file is missing information for one of > the .po files and at least one of the python files, please check all the > files for differing copyright information and document them in > debian/copyright. mc and Ctrl+x q is probably the best way to do that. I corrected

Re: Bug#491858: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

2008-08-06 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le Wednesday 06 August 2008 03:20:08 Ben Finney, vous avez écrit : > "Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > libjzlib-java - Reimplementation of zlib in pure java Hi Ben, > Please fix the package synopsis to conform with the guidelines in > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/develope

Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)

2008-08-06 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
Hi Vincent, On 08/08/04 21:14 +0200, Vincent Bernat said ... > I have uploaded this new version. Thank you :) > I don't know if I have already told it (if so, excuse the repetition) > but since pytagsfs has unittests, you can run them unless there is > nocheck in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. > >

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 18:14 +0200, Thibaut GIRKA wrote: > > The change to arch all added some lintian info messages, please setup > > your build environment to always run lintian -i -I on successful > > builds or on dupload/dput. > > Sorry. It's now ok. Just noticed that the copyright file is mi

Re: RFS: CLAM, C++ library for audio and music

2008-08-06 Thread David García Garzón
Related bug #493282. Any other information missing? On Dimarts 05 Agost 2008, David García Garzón wrote: > (I am sorry, my previous mail to the list fled from my computer without my > consent ;-) Here is the full one.) > > Package: clam > Description: CLAM, C++ library for audio and music > Lice

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Thibaut GIRKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One more thing: the package is arch any, but there don't seem to be >> any architecture-specific files in it. I guess this is a mistake? > > Yes, it was. The change to arch all added some lintian info messages, please se

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Thibaut GIRKA
Hi, > One more thing: the package is arch any, but there don't seem to be > any architecture-specific files in it. I guess this is a mistake? Yes, it was. Best regards, Thibaut GIRKA. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Thibaut GIRKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Package looks good otherwise. > > Thanks :) One more thing: the package is arch any, but there don't seem to be any architecture-specific files in it. I guess this is a mistake? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/Paul

Re: How much user notice.

2008-08-06 Thread paddy
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:23:40PM -0600, David L. Anselmi wrote: > I have a question about this bug (my reply to it isn't significant): > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491868 > > Upgrading apache breaks virtual hosts. The user is expected to read > NEWS.Debian to notice tha

Re: Packaging Java Tomcat web app howto ?

2008-08-06 Thread Olivier Berger
Le mercredi 06 août 2008 à 16:04 +0200, Eric Lavarde - Debian a écrit : > Hi Olivier, > > I move this thread to debian-java, where it belongs :-) - debian-mentors > in Bcc Thanks I'll try and summarize here on mentors if I get conclusive help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER

Re: Packaging Java Tomcat web app howto ?

2008-08-06 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi Olivier, I move this thread to debian-java, where it belongs :-) - debian-mentors in Bcc I think that the short answer is that there is no such howto, but I might be wrong: - there was a thread about the topic http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2007/12/msg00039.html (and you can search furthe

RFS: wordpress-openid

2008-08-06 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wordpress-openid". * Package name: wordpress-openid Version : 2.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Will Norris, Alan J. Castonguay, Factory Joe * URL : http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/ * License : GPL & m

Packaging Java Tomcat web app howto ?

2008-08-06 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Is there any howto document explaining how to package a java tomcat web app for Debian ? I'm considering the possibility to try and package CAS server (Central Authentication Service and thus address the corresponding RFP I've just filed : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4939

Re: upstream has license which is an edited GPL

2008-08-06 Thread Ben Finney
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > = > > Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies > > of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. > > = > > > > So, ev

Re: Lintian warning messages

2008-08-06 Thread Ben Finney
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 5 August 2008 14:02, Richard Hurt wrote: > > W: : script-non-executable -- Since this is a scripted > > web application (RoR) there are quite a few "scripts" that are not > > executable directly in the shell. Can I turn this warning off for

Re: Bug#491858: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

2008-08-06 Thread Ben Finney
"Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > libjzlib-java - Reimplementation of zlib in pure java Please fix the package synopsis to conform with the guidelines in http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-pkg-synopsis>. The proper name

How much user notice.

2008-08-06 Thread David L. Anselmi
I have a question about this bug (my reply to it isn't significant): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491868 Upgrading apache breaks virtual hosts. The user is expected to read NEWS.Debian to notice that and fix it. Would it be better to give notice during the upgrade? Even

Re: Lintian warning messages

2008-08-06 Thread Richard Hurt
On Aug 5, 2008, at 6:34 PM| Aug 5, 2008, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: Except, perhaps, from scripts which end up installed in the directories in the path. For scripts that are not in the path (and even if the execute bit set can only be executed with extra measures from the user) it should

Re: Lintian warning messages

2008-08-06 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:56:59 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > Joey Hess wrote: > > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > >> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so > >> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy. > > > > I'm not aware of any such thing in policy >

Re: [Fwd] bug #292231 - fixed in upstream, pending 412 days

2008-08-06 Thread jaromil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 bonjour Vincent, On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 08:34:23PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Pendant le repas du mardi 05 août 2008, vers 19:08, jaromil > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > >> If you want package to be in Lenny, you should prepa

Re: [Fwd] bug #292231 - fixed in upstream, pending 412 days

2008-08-06 Thread jaromil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 07:46:15AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > I have uploaded a fixed version. I will ask for freeze exception once it > has built on most archs. i'm forever grateful! after new debian version is out and we have more time for ev

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-06 Thread Thibaut GIRKA
Hi, Paul. > Thibaut, the initial owner of the ITP was Luca Falavigna > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is there any reason you've hijacked it? > Usually it is a good idea to write some message in the bug log if you > take over an ITP from someone else. In fact, I started the debian package before making an

Re: [Fwd] bug #292231 - fixed in upstream, pending 412 days

2008-08-06 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du mercredi 06 août 2008, vers 04:54, jaromil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : >> I though that you wanted to do the NMU yourself. Do you seek for >> someone else to do it? I can do it if you wish. > given the urgency (lenny frozen) i'd be grateful for your supp

Subject: RFS: amule-emc

2008-08-06 Thread Sandro Tosi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amule-emc". * Package name: amule-emc Version : 0.5.2-1 Upstream Author : Johannes Krampf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/amule-emc/ * License : GPLv2 Section : utils It bu