Re: where are __amd64 and __i386 defined?

2008-06-29 Thread Star Liu
thanks for your description, i finally found the doc: http://predef.sourceforge.net/prearch.html, it's a little hard. :) On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Star Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I read this line in a c source file: > > #if defined (__

Re: Use of hfsprogs in Ubuntu

2008-06-29 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Keeping these lists in the loop by Rogerio's request. I like keeping people in the loop, but I don't want to send messages where they're unwanted; send me a private mail if you think we should trim the CC: list. On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi, Asheesh. First of all, thank you

Re: where are __amd64 and __i386 defined?

2008-06-29 Thread Russ Allbery
"Star Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I read this line in a c source file: > #if defined (__sun) && (defined(__i386) || defined(__amd64)) > I'm wondering where are __sun __amd and 64 __i386 defined? They're defined by the compiler. There's a "standard" set of such defines that the compiler s

where are __amd64 and __i386 defined?

2008-06-29 Thread Star Liu
I read this line in a c source file: #if defined (__sun) && (defined(__i386) || defined(__amd64)) I'm wondering where are __sun __amd and 64 __i386 defined? thanks! -- ---

Re: Debian turns 15 this year

2008-06-29 Thread Star Liu
I hope there will be a celebration in shanghai, china. :) On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Hubert Chathi wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:22:24 +0800, "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:2

Re: Debian turns 15 this year

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Thomas
On Jun 29, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Hubert Chathi wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:22:24 +0800, "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't seen this discussed yet, so I just wanted to point out: Debian will be 15 years o

Re: Debian turns 15 this year

2008-06-29 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:22:24 +0800, "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I haven't seen this discussed yet, so I just wanted to point out: >> Debian will be 15 years old this August 16th. I also notice that >> Debconf

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 18:38 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Neil Williams ha scritto: > > >> freemat needs some files (*.f) that are not exists as a separate package > >> in Debian > > > > If those are generated files, the -dev should provide them. > > If they are source files (i.e. modifiable)

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Neil Williams ha scritto: >> freemat needs some files (*.f) that are not exists as a separate package >> in Debian > > If those are generated files, the -dev should provide them. > If they are source files (i.e. modifiable), these files must be > explicitly covered by a compatible licence. You do

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 17:47 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Neil Williams ha scritto: > > Do you mean these are embedded source? Source code that already exists > > as a separate package in Debian should not be duplicated in NEW > > packages. Use the existing library support and remove the unwant

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Williams ha scritto: > Do you mean these are embedded source? Source code that already exists > as a separate package in Debian should not be duplicated in NEW > packages. Use the existing library support and remove the unwanted > source files fro

Re: Debian turns 15 this year

2008-06-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't seen this discussed yet, so I just wanted to point out: Debian > will be 15 years old this August 16th. I also notice that Debconf is > happening at that time (was that on purpose?), so I guess it would be > goo

Debian turns 15 this year

2008-06-29 Thread Hubert Chathi
I haven't seen this discussed yet, so I just wanted to point out: Debian will be 15 years old this August 16th. I also notice that Debconf is happening at that time (was that on purpose?), so I guess it would be good to have a celebration there. I wonder if we'll have enough of us not attending D

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 14:44 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Neil Williams ha scritto: > > > You cannot assert that a licence applies (by patching the files to > > declare a licence attribution) if you do not have confirmation from the > > copyright holders of those files. i.e. you cannot claim t

RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-06-29 Thread Heikki Mäntysaari
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mozvoikko". * Package name: mozvoikko Version : 0.9.5-1 Upstream Authors : Andris Pavenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harri Pitkänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://voikko.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Se

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Neil Williams ha scritto: > You cannot assert that a licence applies (by patching the files to > declare a licence attribution) if you do not have confirmation from the > copyright holders of those files. i.e. you cannot claim that these files > are under any particular licence if upstream have no

Re: Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 13:57 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to package Freemat, Mathematics Framework, but Bernd Zeimetz > informed me that Freemat's upstream are violating the copyright/license > of minpack by not adding the proper copyright/license statements in some > fi

Freemat license issue

2008-06-29 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Hello, I'm trying to package Freemat, Mathematics Framework, but Bernd Zeimetz informed me that Freemat's upstream are violating the copyright/license of minpack by not adding the proper copyright/license statements in some files. I and Bernd Zeimetz have asked upstream to fix it,but never got a r

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-06-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01:18AM +, Yavor Doganov a écrit : > ?? Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:48:32 +0900, Charles Plessy : > > > Would the following be better? > > > > When a Debian binary package is built, variables such as {{{CFLAGS}}}, > > {{{CXXFLAGS}}}, {{{CPPFLAGS}}},... are