2008/6/9 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Uploaded. That will hang in NEW for a while. Thanks for your work and
> patience.
Thank you for sponsoring it!
Regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Monday 09 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually it would be smarter do ship only the detached debugging symbols
> > I believe. I can't think of a use case where the debugging version of
> > the shared library would be desperately needed or prefe
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually it would be smarter do ship only the detached debugging symbols
> I believe. I can't think of a use case where the debugging version of
> the shared library would be desperately needed or preferred, or I'm
> wrong ?
Well, usually the reason wh
On Monday 09 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2008/6/8 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So I believe that the version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1 you have uploaded to mentors
> > on 07-Jun-2008 22:00 (ah I hate dealing with rewritten changelog
> > history;-) is basically ok, except that lintian ove
On Monday 09 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > shared library goes in /usr/lib and as expected lintian complains with:
> > libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libPocoXMLd5
> > because of the missing 'd' before '5', at least, hence that le
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> shared library goes in /usr/lib and as expected lintian complains with:
> libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libPocoXMLd5
> because of the missing 'd' before '5', at least, hence that leads us to a
> package name as `libpocoxmld5-dbg',
2008/6/8 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So I believe that the version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1 you have uploaded to mentors on
> 07-Jun-2008 22:00 (ah I hate dealing with rewritten changelog history;-) is
> basically ok, except that lintian override files should be installed for all
> these -dbg packag
Hi!
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblwp-authen-negotiate-perl".
* Package name: liblwp-authen-negotiate-perl
Version : 0.06-1
Upstream Author : Achim Grolms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~agrolms/LWP-Authen-Negotiate-0.06/
* License
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my packages libtorrent-rasterbar and
qBittorrent (which depends on the library). This is my second attempt,
and I'm not the "first owner" of the ITP... unfortunately no one DD
seems to be interested here. Having this library in Debian is really
importan
pgpSOJvZdCITB.pgp
Description: PGP message
pgp78XBhLWrZr.pgp
Description: PGP message
2008/6/8 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It might be interesting to use a debug build, and share the backtraces,
> so that one can check whether that's the same bug, when the segfault
> happens.
Below is the backtrace from tesseract built with gcc-4.2 and
--as-needed. Repeating it without -
cobrancas Modelos de Cartas Comercias gratis, carta comercial de todos os tipos
Emprego, modelos de convites modelos de respostas a propostas comerciais
Visite:
http://www.modelosdecartascomerciais.com
Oferecemos um pacote de modelos de cartas comerciais dicas de como redigir,
textos
prontos
On Sunday 08 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> > Hello George,
Hi Krzysztof,
--cut--
> So, as libpkg-guide suggests in table 5.1 (soname: libfoo.so.4 => pkgname:
> libfoo4) and lintian asks us to end in -dbg since we install
> in /usr/lib/de
On 08/06/2008, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> I uploaded tesseract-ocr 2.03-1 with --as-needed, but have had this
> bug reported:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484052
>
> i.e. the test case in the bug report segfaults if tesseract is
> compiled with gcc 4.2 with or with --as-ne
On 08/06/2008, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> You should ask for help in [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is definitely a bug in
> g++ but they may provide better insights on this problem.
Blah. Better contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, that's likely to be a lack
of RAM (especially on europa), and the build has then to
Hi Daniel,
I seem to have missed your mail, sorry.
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:01:39 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> David Paleino wrote:
> > DKMS is a framework designed to allow individual kernel modules to be
> > upgraded without changing the whole kernel. It is also very easy to rebuild
> > module
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 08 juin 2008, vers 16:01,
Patrik Fimml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> [eboard packages]
>>
>> Both of them have been uploaded.
> It seems that eboard-1.1.1-2 makes g++ segfault on arm. [1] What should
> I do in this case, file bugs on eboard and g++
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:15:23PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> [eboard packages]
>
> Both of them have been uploaded.
It seems that eboard-1.1.1-2 makes g++ segfault on arm. [1] What should
I do in this case, file bugs on eboard and g++, or only g++? I cannot
try to track down the problem, how
Hi,
I prepared a QA upload for bgoffice (Bulgarian dictionaries).
It closes the following bugs:
- #353313: aspell-bg: uninstalls uncleanly
(merged with #454943)
- #373739: myspell-bg: please add bg.{dic,aff} -> bg_BG.{dic,aff} symlink
I also did the following changes:
- Bump standards versi
2008/4/29 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You could try and use LDFLAGS to pass -Wl,--as-needed (linker flags).
> But since it could break silently some parts of your build, it shouldn't
> be used without -Wl,-z,defs which will help spot possible missing -l$foo
> options in intermediate
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 06:48:48PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Where can we find your package?
My mistake, gmail interpreted your signed message as an attachment.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should download everything required, right?
>
>
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 06:48:48PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Please put some text in your emails with details of the package to be
> sponsored.
>
> > RFS: ucblogo (updated package that fixes RC bug #484448)
>
Hi William,
* William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-08 12:18]:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.7.beta-13
> of my package "sniffit".
I just tried sniffit and it's segfaulting on my system (amd64) in
nearly every combination of command line parameters except
if used with -
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Please put some text in your emails with details of the package to be sponsored.
> RFS: ucblogo (updated package that fixes RC bug #484448)
#484448 is a RG (release goal) bug not an RC one.
Where can we find your pa
> However, vidalia doesn't work very nicely with the Debian package for Tor.
>
What I can do to help in the prepackaging process is ask user whether they
want to stop the existing Tor process or not, and told them that they might
have to add 'ControlPort 9051' to the correct torrc. If user say yes
pgptug7FJS2gB.pgp
Description: PGP message
On Sunday 08 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
--cut--
> Yes, dh_strip -k was called to split debigging symbols in a separate file
> (containing the detached debugging symbols) in usr/lib/debug/, in order to
> avoid binary duplications with things we want debugable, but the above
> oneliner produces
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du samedi 07 juin 2008, vers 04:36,
Juan Angulo Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> In my previous post, I told you that there was no mention of the exact
>> license of lsat in upstream sources. However, I discovered that upstream
>> put GPLv2 at the end of
29 matches
Mail list logo
