Re: foo.diff.gz "difficult to read" (was: RFS: bugs-everywhere)

On 25/04/2008, Ben Finney wrote: > How is it difficult to read? I've opened it in Emacs and 'zless' and > in either of them it reads like any other diff. Like any other unified > diff, the changes are clearly marked by file, hunk location, and > context lines. What readability problems are you seei

Re: foo.diff.gz "difficult to read"

OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du vendredi 25 avril 2008, vers 03:58, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Did you get the mail from Alexander? [from Alexander Schmehl, on a >> different thread. >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/04/

Re: Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz

Ben Finney wrote: > Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Ben Finney wrote: >> >> > What would be the best way to keep such a directory in place, but >> > exclude the directory from the Debian source and binary packages? >> >> dpkg-source -i"regexp"? > > Thanks. That looks like the

Re: Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz

Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > > What would be the best way to keep such a directory in place, but > > exclude the directory from the Debian source and binary packages? > > dpkg-source -i"regexp"? Thanks. That looks like the right functionality, indeed. How

ITA: tkgate (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0~a11.dfsg.1-1 of my package "tkgate". It builds these binary packages: tkgate - Tcl/Tk based digital circuit editor and simulator tkgate-data - Tcl/Tk based digital circuit editor and simulator tkgate-doc - Tcl/Tk based digital c

Re: Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz

Ben Finney wrote: > What would be the best way to keep such a directory in place, but > exclude the directory from the Debian source and binary packages? dpkg-source -i"regexp"? -- Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz

Howdy mentors, I have a working tree for a package that's under version control; the working tree is specific to the Debian packaging for the software. That working tree contains a (version-controlled) directory that must remain in the working tree, and remain under version control, but should *n

Re: A question about adopting a package

Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > You don't actually need the 'quit', but it hurts noone. > > There actuatually seems to be a trend to use 'kthxbye' nowadays, which > is not documented, but seems to work, and a lot cooler and lolcatter

foo.diff.gz "difficult to read" (was: RFS: bugs-everywhere)

Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you get the mail from Alexander? [from Alexander Schmehl, on a > different thread. > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/04/msg00330.html>] > I agree with him: the diff.gz is difficult to read. How is it difficult to read? I've opened it i

Re: Packaging without Makefile

Dominik George wrote: [...] > Sounds easy - but how do I get it to copy my one single file? What Dmitry > suggested does not quite work ... The debian/rules file *is* a Makefile --- so at the very worst you can just change the bit that invokes upstream's Makefile to a cp. -- ┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ

Re: A question about adopting a package

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Amaya wrote: > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > You don't actually need the 'quit', but it hurts noone. > > There actuatually seems to be a trend to use 'kthxbye' nowadays, > which is not documented, but seems to work, and a lot cooler and > lolcatter It is "documnted" o

Re: A question about adopting a package

Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > You don't actually need the 'quit', but it hurts noone. There actuatually seems to be a trend to use 'kthxbye' nowadays, which is not documented, but seems to work, and a lot cooler and lolcatter From http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control quit

[Uploaded] liblunar and lunar-applet

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:43:05PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote: > a new version 1.0.0-1 uploaded to mentors.debian.net Looks good, I uploaded it. Please let me know when it passes NEW, so the new lunar-applet can be uploaded as well. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail

Re: A question about adopting a package

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:36:37PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:25:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > Shall this mail sent from my own address to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] suffice for setting an ITA? > > > > === 8< ==

Re: A question about adopting a package

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:25:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > As I have never worked with the BTS control bot, I am asking for > directions. Shall this mail sent from my own address to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] suffice for setting an ITA? > > === 8< =

A question about adopting a package

Hello mentors, Reading the list of orphaned packages I have noticed that package "nec" has been orphaned [1]. Because I use NEC2 in antenna related research I think that I can adopt this package. At the moment I am not a maintainer of any package in Debian nor a DD, however I have been packaging

Re: RFS: liblunar and lunar-applet

Hello, On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello again, > > I should have been much faster with this, but better late than never I > guess... > > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:43:09PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Bas Wijnen <

Re: RFS: bugs-everywhere

On 24/04/2008, Ben Finney wrote: > > Did you get the mail from Alexander? > > Alexander who? When was it sent? Schmehl. http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/04/msg00330.html Mraw, KiBi. pgpCHeoD6L7Mb.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: bugs-everywhere

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:38:17 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Did you get the mail from Alexander? > > Alexander who? When was it sent? This message : -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: RFS: bugs-everywhere

Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:41:30 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Howdy mentors, > > > > I have a package that is seeking a sponsor. > > > > Package name: bugs-everywhere > > Version:0.0.193-2~rc1 > > Upstream

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai (updated package)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1 > of my package "xiterm+thai". Uploaded. For future reference, please mention changes like the security issue in the RFS. Please remember to prepare a security u

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai (updated package)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1 > of my package "xiterm+thai". Uploaded. For future reference, please mention changes like the security issue in the RFS. Please remember to prepare a security u

Re: RFS: meshlab

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:43:03 +0200, "Teemu Ikonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "meshlab". > > * Package name: meshlab > Version : 1.1.1-1 > Upstream Author : Paolo Cignoni and others > * URL : http://meshlab

RFS: meshlab

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "meshlab". * Package name: meshlab Version : 1.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Paolo Cignoni and others * URL : http://meshlab.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2+ Section : misc It builds these binary pa

RFS: xiterm+thai (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1 of my package "xiterm+thai". It builds these binary packages: xiterm+thai - X terminal program with Thai languague support The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://m

Re: RFS: bugs-everywhere

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:41:30 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy mentors, > > I have a package that is seeking a sponsor. > > Package name: bugs-everywhere > Version:0.0.193-2~rc1 > Upstream Author:Aaron Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >