Le Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 09:09:23AM -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> A NEWS entry isn't unreasonable. Supporting the old binary might be
> nice; a wrapper with a warning rather than a symlink is extra friendly.
> Be sure to use "exec" as the last line of a wrapper script to remove
> unnecessary me
Hi
Thanks for taking care of this package.
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.57-3
> of my package "yacas".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> yacas - Computer Algebra System
> yacas-doc - Documentation for Yacas
> yacas-proteus - User interface for yacas based on fltk
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.57-3
of my package "yacas".
It builds these binary packages:
yacas - Computer Algebra System
yacas-doc - Documentation for Yacas
yacas-proteus - User interface for yacas based on fltk
The package is lintian clean.
The uplo
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 07:56 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What would you choose and why?
>
> You could also write a wrapper script around the binary so that the
> user can see the license when they first run the program. This gets
> arou
On 3/17/07, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What would you choose and why?
You could also write a wrapper script around the binary so that the
user can see the license when they first run the program. This gets
around the dpkg and debconf issues.
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailD
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:52:18PM +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com" wrote:
> Hi mentors,
> hi Dpkg developers,
>
> i could need some help with a bug that has been reported to be in one of
> my packages. According to #408823 my package removes a configuration
> file when dpkg-reconfigure is i
Hi mentors,
hi Dpkg developers,
i could need some help with a bug that has been reported to be in one of
my packages. According to #408823 my package removes a configuration
file when dpkg-reconfigure is invoked. I'm really wondering about this,
because that means that dpkg invokes my prerm script
On 2007-03-16, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> What would you choose and why?
If there is a need for a click-wrap license - look at the sun java
packages.
But if the license don't require click-wrap, I would just ship it in
debian/copyright. People should know that non-free stuff
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 14:37 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Daniel,
>
> I have a package for a software, that is provided under an academic
> license - free for non-profit organisations and academic use, not free
> for profit organisations.
> So I want to put a debconf template into
> pr
Hi,
I have a package for a software, that is provided under an academic
license - free for non-profit organisations and academic use, not free
for profit organisations. So I want to put a debconf template into
preinst, so the user MUST accept the license, before he installs the
package (and of cou
10 matches
Mail list logo
