Re: Versionned dependancies on build-essential packages. (was: Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?)

2007-02-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2007-02-24 Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:30:38PM +0100, Andreas Metzler a écrit : > > Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>=1.13.19) [...] > [Thread from -devel diverted to -mentors.] I do not follow that list, thanks for the cc. > I was just wondering the reason

RFS: clamfs

2007-02-24 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clamfs". * Package name: clamfs Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : (I'm ClamFS author) * URL : http://clamfs.sf.net/ * License : GPL Section : utils It builds these binary packages: clamfs -

Re: Versionned dependancies on build-essential packages. (was: Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?)

2007-02-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:35:44PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:30:38PM +0100, Andreas Metzler a ?crit : > > > Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>=1.13.19) > > Package: foo > > Architecture: all > > Depends: foo-binary (>= ${source:Version}), foo-binary (<< > > ${source:Versi