On 2007-02-24 Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:30:38PM +0100, Andreas Metzler a écrit : > > Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>=1.13.19) [...] > [Thread from -devel diverted to -mentors.]
I do not follow that list, thanks for the cc. > I was just wondering the reason why the build-dependancy on dpkg-dev is > necessary. Dpkg-dev is build-essential and is > 1.13.19 in unstable and > testing anyway. Couldn't this be safely omitted when uploading for > unstable ? It is indeed not necessary for unstable, but it makes a backporter's work more easy. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
