sawfish, a window manager implemented in lisp, has been orphaned by its
previous maintainer (#373702)
I would like to adopt it, but I would require help and an sponsor. sawfish
does not appear to be heavy on maintenance (upstream CVS shows 37
commits over the last year, there are 26 normal and 20
Hi Goswin,
Thanks for your response.
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 15:50 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages
> > in
> > http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packag
Hi
On 6/17/06, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But is there a reason for using ';' instead of '.' in
changelog lines?
When I use ; I try to say that there are more itens after the current
one. A period means "it's the end, there isn't anything more below
this line".
It's something like
Nikolai Lusan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
[cut]
Hi.
> I get the feeling that this should be easy to deal with by compiling the
> library packages and installing them so that debhelper can find things
> in the right place, I am just a little unsure on how to do this.
I'm not a mentor.
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:58:29 +0200, Vedran Fura? wrote:
> >> The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be
> >> any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 -> 1.1-1 -> 1.2-1 .
> > Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a?
> No problem, but one question, just
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vedran Fura? wrote:
>> The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be
>> any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 -> 1.1-1 -> 1.2-1 .
>
> Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a?
No problem, but one question, just to be su
Hi,
* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-17 22:59]:
> Could someone, please, verify and upload (if there are no
> problems) an
> updated package of OptiPNG, please?
I only did a quick check of your .diff.gz file. Looks ok.
But is there a reason for using ';' instead of '.' in
ch
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:57:11PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Could someone, please, verify and upload (if there are no problems) an
> updated package of OptiPNG, please?
>
> It's a new upstream version, fixing one bug and one typo.
> Also, OptiPNG is already on Debian (kindly sponsored
Hi!
Could someone, please, verify and upload (if there are no problems) an
updated package of OptiPNG, please?
It's a new upstream version, fixing one bug and one typo.
Also, OptiPNG is already on Debian (kindly sponsored by Florian Ragwitz).
Files are all available here:
http://biolinux.df.ibi
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 15:57 -0400, Alec Berryman wrote:
Forget rewriting them, how about just aggregating them into one
package?
Sounds better. I mean to one binary with switches like
--from= and --to= .
My main objection is that this makes th
[I'm subscribed, not need to Cc]
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 12:43 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agree. Also, binary ones sounds better for me; or if someone would like
> > to reinvent the wheel, then please do it in Python instead of Perl.
> I c
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi Asheesh,
Sounds good to have this.
Hi! Thanks for the quick reply!
Anyway, the package may use debhelper compatibility level 5, but that
would make Sarge backports a very bit 'harder'.
Right, I think it's better to use debhelper compatibil
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Alec Berryman wrote:
Asheesh Laroia on 2006-06-17 15:03:22 -0400:
I want to add that there are a lot of these little *2iso programs, and
most of them are dead upstream because they are simple, well-tested
programs that are complete. Someone on #debian-mentors suggested
Asheesh Laroia on 2006-06-17 15:03:22 -0400:
> I want to add that there are a lot of these little *2iso programs, and
> most of them are dead upstream because they are simple, well-tested
> programs that are complete. Someone on #debian-mentors suggested
> rewriting them in Perl in one package
Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agree. Also, binary ones sounds better for me; or if someone would like
> to reinvent the wheel, then please do it in Python instead of Perl.
I certainly hope this is just your opinion and isn't official debian
advice...
- T
Hi Asheesh,
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 15:03 -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> ccd2iso is a program to convert CloneCD images to normal .iso CD image
> files. It's helpful for users who have made CloneCD images of discs that
> they want to use in a Free OS.
Sounds good to have this.
> I want to add t
ccd2iso is a program to convert CloneCD images to normal .iso CD image
files. It's helpful for users who have made CloneCD images of discs that
they want to use in a Free OS.
I've packaged it and would like comments or (preferably!) someone to
sponsor this upload. It's lintian and Linda clea
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 20:35 +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages
> in
> http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak&rev=HEAD
> as kindly suggested by Justin Pryzby here:
> http://lists.debi
On 6/17/06, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
The whole DK thing is experimental, but for those wishing to experiment,
at
least Exim and SpamAssassin are prepared to use these prospective
packages.
It is also my understanding that Yahoo's license, unlike Microsoft's
SenderID
Hi,
Vedran Fura? wrote:
> The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be
> any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 -> 1.1-1 -> 1.2-1 .
Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a?
Anyway, I just saw a bug testing this for upload again...
You register the h
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for subclipse (ITP: #238733) and several related
packages (cdbs-eclipse is used for building the subclipse package itself and
other packages are libraries used by subclipse). All packages pass
lintian/linda check. Their licenses look DFSG-compliant to me.
The pack
On 2006-06-10, Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm seeking a sponsor for packages for Xapian (http://www.xapian.org/).
>
> I'm the main upstream developer of Xapian. Richard Boulton (another
> Xapian developer) did the original packaging work, and more recently
> I've been maintaining them
Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages
> in
> http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak&rev=HEAD
> as kindly suggested by Justin Pryzby here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-
Hello all,
I requested the deletion of the old llk-linux package from the
mentors.debian.net and it seems the admin deleted the new package instead of
that. It should be okay now :) Sorry for inconvience.
I've also rewritten the descriptions:
* Package name: lianliankan
Version :
You can get a better response on debian-mentors. CCing.
andrew
On 6/17/06, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings, official and unofficial Debian developers!
First, let me introduce myself. I'm a 27-year-old male from Sweden, for the
time being living in Linköping where I am (or
Dear mentors,
I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages
in
http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak&rev=HEAD
as kindly suggested by Justin Pryzby here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/04/msg00340.html
I have asked the maintainers o
26 matches
Mail list logo
