On 4/28/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I found two more things while testing the upgrade.
First, you should bump your versioned depends on tex-common to 0.19,
since you need a working dh_installtex.
That means replacing ${misc:Depends} with explicit info.
Hmm.. OK. I've do
"Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I'm not sure at all! :) I suppose that field should tell the
> package builder "Ehi, use debian policy version XXX while building
> this package" and so every script involved will use this information
> to validate the package against the d-p specifie
> Uhm... Are you sure you just need to change that field to make your
> package follow the most recent policy?
No, I'm not sure at all! :) I suppose that field should tell the
package builder "Ehi, use debian policy version XXX while building
this package" and so every script involved will use th
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:57:27PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've adopted an old package, and in its PTS page I can read "The
> package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
> (Standards-Version 3.6.2 instead of 3.5.10)." and so I'd like to
> upgrade to the news
Hi!
* Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060427 21:57]:
[..]
> Is this simple as just change "Standards-Version:" inside
> debian/control and generate the package to get all the errors (but do
> this generates errors/warnings?
Uhm... Are you sure you just need to change that field to make your
pa
> Hi all,
> I've adopted an old package, and in its PTS page I can read "The
> package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
> (Standards-Version 3.6.2 instead of 3.5.10)." and so I'd like to
> upgrade to the news Debian Polcy version.
>
> I've searched on google, and inside
Hi all,
I've adopted an old package, and in its PTS page I can read "The
package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
(Standards-Version 3.6.2 instead of 3.5.10)." and so I'd like to
upgrade to the news Debian Polcy version.
I've searched on google, and inside DD Ref and d
> But when ghc6 6.4.2 hits unstable, all libghc6-* packages must be
> rebuilt anyway.
>
> That's also why you need to tighten up the existing ghc6 deps. See
> http://urchin.earth.li/%7Eian/haskell-policy/haskell-policy.html/ch-libraries.html#s-library_impl_deps
> for details.
I know, but the Depe
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:41:41PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> >From the changelog:
> >> - Add versioned libghc6-cabal-dev and ghc6 to the Build-Depends to
> >> use Cabal version 1.1.1 or later which introduces a new
> >> installation prefix for libraries.
>
> The versio
I've been trying for a while to get texmaker to work. There an issue I have
been working on for a month and don't know how to fix it. The latex help
manuels can't be found but they are in
/debian/texmaker/usr/share/doc/texmaker . If somebody could show me what to
do to get the package to "see" t
"Theppitak Karoonboonyanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/25/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'll not be able to do this today (I think), please remind me if I don't
>> speak up by tomorrow evening.
>
> I guess all necessary issues are covered, including texlive.
> If it still
Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ /usr/bin/apxs2 -q "LIBEXECDIR"
> /usr/lib/apache2/modules
>
> Yet on my work system, lintian complains with that. On my home system, both
> with pbuilder and just plain debuild, the warning does not appear.
>
> This is confusing me. On my home system
Thanks for the reply. I'll just sit and wait until I will notice its
accepted or rejetced. Gerber
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:45 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:19:29PM +0200, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> > About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
> Hi,
>
> I checked out the package and there are some problems with your
> dependencies. You need to make sure to depend on a specific version of
> GHC, in both the build-deps and the package deps. ghc 6.4.2 is not in
> sid yet, so referencing it doesn't help right now.
>From the changelog:
>>
Hi,
I checked out the package and there are some problems with your
dependencies. You need to make sure to depend on a specific version of
GHC, in both the build-deps and the package deps. ghc 6.4.2 is not in
sid yet, so referencing it doesn't help right now.
-- John
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:19:29PM +0200, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
> find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
> has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
Do you know http://ftp-mast
Hi!
On 4/27/06, Gerber van der Graaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
> find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
> has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
The bug will be closed just when
About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
The ITP bug reports version 0.3.2, but the upstream version (that has
been packaged by me) has been in
Panu Kalliokoski a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:48:14AM +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
When I installed the manpage in usual directory (/usr/share/man/man1) I
got :
E: aircrack-ng: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/
N:
N: As of policy version 3.0.0.0, Debian no longer follows the FSSTND.
N: N: In
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:48:14AM +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
> When I installed the manpage in usual directory (/usr/share/man/man1) I
> got :
> E: aircrack-ng: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/
> N:
> N: As of policy version 3.0.0.0, Debian no longer follows the FSSTND.
> N: N: Instead, the Filesystem
Salut,
Tu peux gagner de l'argent pendant que tu surfes sur internet, C'EST FACILE et
GRATUIT !!!
Clique sur http://www.eurobarre.com/index.php?p=538679484051
@+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
This one time, at band camp, Le_Vert said:
> >
> When I installed the manpage in usual directory (/usr/share/man/man1) I
> got :
> E: aircrack-ng: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/
This looks more like you're installing something to /usr/man/man1,
instead of /usr/_share_/man/man1. Are you sure it's not
Hi Justin,
Thanks a lot for your help. I've send a message to James to get this
amended.
I had read but obviously not understood the implications mentioned in
5.10.4 from the Developer's Reference.
Thanks again and best regards,
Andree
--
Andree Leidenfrost
Sydney - Australia
signature.asc
D
Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore I think it's in fact a team maintained package, I think it
> would be usefull to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the
> Maintainer: (so we'll get bug reports and other usefull stuff send to
> that list) and you as Uploader: (since you prepared that
Justin Pryzby a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:20:38AM +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
Hello,
It seems that debian has change its policies about manpages directories
hierarchy.
Lintian gives me an error if I install manpages
into /usr/share/man/man1/. So I read the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
25 matches
Mail list logo
