Re: RFS: checkinstall

2006-04-05 Thread Felipe Sateler
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > The package looks fine, builds fine, good work. The only think I'd > change is to remove the README.Debian file. That contains information > that's already known: all Debian packages put their config under /etc. Done. I had put it in there because the original package insta

Re: [gmail] Re: Suggestion: Time limit for NM process

2006-04-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At some point I needed a number of perl packages that did syntax > highlighting and that were not available in Debian (yet). Since I don't > want to install anything on my machine that is not packages, I packaged > the Perl packages for Debian and used the

RFS: erlang, erlang-manpages, erlang-doc-html

2006-04-05 Thread Francois-Denis Gonthier
Hi I would like somebody to check and upload those three packages.  My usual sponsor is apparently MIA.  The erlang 10.b.9-3 is an bugfix for the -2 version that is currently in unstable.  It fixes a handful of bugs. I've put the packages in my personnal repository at http://neutronic.mine.nu/

Re: RFS: checkinstall

2006-04-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Felipe, On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 15:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Apparently my package is good enough, since it didn't get any more comments > in my RFC thread [1]. I tried one last time to contact Matt Hope (previous > checkinstall maintainer), and gave him a week to answer, but he didn't

Re: RFS: scim-bridge--Yet another IM client for scim

2006-04-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:53 +0800, Hou ZhengPeng wrote: > Description : Another IM client of SCIM > Scim-bridge is yet another IM client of SCIM. > The im-module of scim-bridge communicates with > scim via socket. Maybe in the description you can tell us casual bystanders what "SCIM" is

Re: Re: RFS: texmaker

2006-04-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hey Joseph, On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:21 -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote: > I think I have fixed the problems in my .diff and control files. The > new files have been uploaded to: > > http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/debianpackages > > Hopefully now it is ready to be sponsered. :) Thanks a l

Re: first package pcftisio

2006-04-05 Thread Ben Finney
On 05-Apr-2006, Cedric BRINER wrote: > I have re-launched the author of pcfitsio and he finally give me > some news : ) and he replies me two emails: > > 1)--- > pCFITSIO is really completely fee, no guaranteed etc... I did not > have the same to add the copyright notice

Re: Suggestion: Time limit for NM process

2006-04-05 Thread Jon Dowland
At 1144019257 past the epoch, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > Okay, I'll bite: Any company that hires 50% of its applicants is > growing damned fast. Certainly faster than is sustainable. This is a bit of a bad analogy: most companies won't have people working for them who they haven't hired :) -- Jon Do

Re: Program for creating and managing APT repositories

2006-04-05 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I am not quite sure it is the best place to post this, but anyway. > > I wrote a Python script to create and manage APT repositories which has > the following features: I think reprepro obsoletes your efforts. I think it already covers all y

Re: [gmail] Re: Suggestion: Time limit for NM process

2006-04-05 Thread Marc Leeman
> > As long as my sponsors don't mind uploading the packages and I can use > > aloith to cooperate with others, I don't feel the need anymore to > > continue and try again for full DD; though I'm sure I would have > > contributed more (a number of packages never found a sponsor, so I > > dropped th

Re: first package pcftisio

2006-04-05 Thread Cedric BRINER
hello, I have re-launched the author of pcfitsio and he finally give me some news : ) and he replies me two emails: 1)--- pCFITSIO is really completely fee, no guaranteed etc... I did not have the same to add the copyright notice in the code or anything. I will try to do