subscribe

2005-12-11 Thread César Gómez Martín
-- César Gómez Martín - www.cesargomez.org -

RFS: switchconf

2005-12-11 Thread Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz
I am the upstream of switchconf and have prepared a new version to fix 3 bugs on BTS: * Abort execution when don't exist configuration file. Closes the bug report "switchconf: exit if the configuration is not found" (Closes #332916) * Sort the files in /etc/switchconf/{before,after}.d befo

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-11 Thread Frank Küster
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:52:30PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: >>On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 08:48:14AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: >>>Dear Sponsors, >>> >>>I am the non-DD maintainer of tex4ht and have been looking for >>>a sponsor for th

Re: Building packages with epoch

2005-12-11 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:26:43AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all! > > I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU > (maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version > 2:1.2-2 > When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebu

Re: Building packages with epoch

2005-12-11 Thread Norbert Preining
On Son, 11 Dez 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > tipa_2%3a1.2-2_all.deb > > If the epoch should've been in the .deb, it'd be ':', not '%3a' (which > is the URL escaping of it, and this is the filename, not the URL). > > This is correct -- the epoch is *not* included in the filenames. Ah

Re: Building packages with epoch

2005-12-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:26:43AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all! > > I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU > (maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version > 2:1.2-2 > When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebu

Building packages with epoch

2005-12-11 Thread Norbert Preining
Dear all! I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU (maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version 2:1.2-2 When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebuild the package with dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot I get a bi