* Package name: preload
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://preload.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : an adaptive readahead daemon
preload monitors applications that users run, and by analyzing this data,
Hi there,
I wanted to delete the date which stored in debconf database when
purge a package. So I added "db_purge" both in prerm and postrm
scripts, but it seemed not work.
Did I miss something? Any hints appreciated.
--
Thanks~
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:42:41PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > /var/cache/install/$PACKAGE?
> > Why not /var/cache/$package/
> > maybe /v/c/$package/install/
>
> OK, I took the last one:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sources]$ ls -al /var/cache/quake3-data/install/
> total 78336
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root
> > /var/cache/install/$PACKAGE?
> Why not /var/cache/$package/
> maybe /v/c/$package/install/
OK, I took the last one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sources]$ ls -al /var/cache/quake3-data/install/
total 78336
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16 2005-11-10 23:33 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 16 2005-11-10 23
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:17:08AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:31:09PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > (most of these problems are probably inherited from the quake2
> > > packaging you used). You will have to fix most of these before
> > > someone should sponsor the pa
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:09:48PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Justin Pryzby may or may not have written...
>
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:09:59PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> [snip]
> >> I decided to put the files in /root/ (like it was in the quake2 package).
> >> The main reason
> > Indeed /root/ feels like a bad place. I would suggest /tmp/ or something
> > in /var/. Maybe /var/cache/, because "information" isn't "lost" if it gets
> > deleted?
>
> /var/cache/install/$PACKAGE?
Looking at the already present directories in /var/cache/ it would be
more something along th
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:14:52PM -0500, DoyenGuy wrote:
> What Debian package is mktemp and tempfile a part of?
>
> And/or, is there a command I can issue on a debian system to find out
> what package a command or program belongs to?
dpkg -S bin/mktemp bin/tempfile
debianutils: /bin/mktemp
debia
On 10-Nov-2005, DoyenGuy wrote:
> What Debian package is mktemp and tempfile a part of?
>
> And/or, is there a command I can issue on a debian system to find out
> what package a command or program belongs to?
Most questions about "how do I find out X to do with packages already
installed on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> What Debian package is mktemp and tempfile a part of?
>
> And/or, is there a command I can issue on a debian system to find out
> what package a command or program belongs to?
dpkg -S /bin/mktemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2
What Debian package is mktemp and tempfile a part of?
And/or, is there a command I can issue on a debian system to find out
what package a command or program belongs to?
Tom
On 11/10/05, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:02:51PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > >
I demand that Justin Pryzby may or may not have written...
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:09:59PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
[snip]
>> I decided to put the files in /root/ (like it was in the quake2 package).
>> The main reason for this is that the downloads are considerable and I can
>> assume that
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:09:59PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > Right; You can also do whatever you want to a file whose name is
> > outputted by a successful invocation of mktemp, but note that this
> > probably wont play nice with wget. If fn=`mktemp`, and you wget -O
> > $fn, then wget will pr
> Right; You can also do whatever you want to a file whose name is
> outputted by a successful invocation of mktemp, but note that this
> probably wont play nice with wget. If fn=`mktemp`, and you wget -O
> $fn, then wget will probably call its outupt $fn.1, since $fn exists
> (as a requirement fo
On Thursday 10 November 2005 19:25, Timo Steuerwald wrote:
> I try to create packages for sipX from sipfoundry.org. This is a PBX
> like asterisk and is composed of a few subprojects like sipXportLib,
> sipXtackLib...
> I now tried to create a package for sipXportLib.
> What I have done up to now:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:02:51PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > That is a tag + security race condition between rm and mkdir. You'll
> > want to use mktemp -d instead.
> fixed, tnx.
>
> > I didn't look at your script closely; there may be other problems.
> > Nothing should ever get written to /t
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Timo Steuerwald wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to create packages for sipX from sipfoundry.org. This is a PBX
> like asterisk and is composed of a few subprojects like sipXportLib,
> sipXtackLib...
> I now tried to create a package for sipXportLib.
> What I
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That is a tag + security race condition between rm and mkdir. You'll
> want to use mktemp -d instead.
fixed, tnx.
> I didn't look at your script closely; there may be other problems.
> Nothing should ever get written to /tmp/ except if the output filename
> is the result of a successful ($?==0
Hi all,
I try to create packages for sipX from sipfoundry.org. This is a PBX
like asterisk and is composed of a few subprojects like sipXportLib,
sipXtackLib...
I now tried to create a package for sipXportLib.
What I have done up to now:
1. Read http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ completel
* Package name: ksudoku
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Francesco Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ksudoku.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : sudoku puzzle generator/solver
KSudoku is an interface for creating and solving sudoku puzzles
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:31:09PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > (most of these problems are probably inherited from the quake2
> > packaging you used). You will have to fix most of these before
> > someone should sponsor the package.
>
> > W: quake3-data:
> > possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-fi
I addressed most of the issues, except:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sources]$ lintian quake3-data_2_all.deb
W: quake3-data: possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-files-in-maintainer-script
postinst:211
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sources]$ lintian quake3_0.1-4_i386.deb
W: quake3: binary-without-manpage q3a
the new pack
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 14:37 +, David Given wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 14:16, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> [...]
> > To answer your first question: you cannot conflict against (or depend
> > upon) specific kernel versions because there is no guarantee that an
> > installed kernel package
On Thursday 10 November 2005 14:16, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
[...]
> To answer your first question: you cannot conflict against (or depend
> upon) specific kernel versions because there is no guarantee that an
> installed kernel package is the kernel that's running at the moment.
Yes, of course.
A
David Given wrote:
> Unfortunately, the application has its own coroutine library that turns out
> to
> have a nasty conflict with linuxthreads (due to allocating its own stacks,
> which causes linuxthreads to crash). linuxthreads is used as part of glibc on
> 2.4 kernels. 2.6 kernels, such as
> (most of these problems are probably inherited from the quake2
> packaging you used). You will have to fix most of these before
> someone should sponsor the package.
They were all quickly fixed. My intention was to see if anyone was
interested in the first place, then do more fundamental functio
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:15:35AM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > > > Anyone intersted in answering the call?
> > > > A link to actual packages files would be good...
> > >
> > > http://scorpius.homelinux.org/~marc/debian/
Hm, the lintian output is not particulary impressive
(most of these probl
Received: (qmail 27832 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2005 10:38:39 -
Received: from cupona1.hp.com (HELO cuprel1.hp.com) (15.13.176.10) by
cxx.cup.hp.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 10:38:39 -
Received: from lists.debian.org (host93-101.pool81119.interbusiness.it
[81.119.101.93]) by cuprel1.
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm including the context diff between essential packages and required
>> ones. Since essential implies required, why isn't there simply another
>> priority class, instead of a separate "Essential" field??
>
You are right, IceWM supports the Debian menu. My IceWM installation got
corrupted and the menus weren't updating, solved now!
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>Are you sure? I've currently only a stable Debian available and that
>supports the Debian menu quite well.
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Erik Schanze wrote:
> Why should the config.* files included into the diff?
Depends on how one like to maintain a package. I for myself prefere to
have it in the diff.gz, otherwise it is left debian-specific and
non-debian users cannot profit from. At the end of the day, it is just a
matter of tas
* Stan Vasilyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051109 23:49]:
> Unfortunately the Debian menu doesn't solve my problem because IceWM
> doesn't support it.
Are you sure? I've currently only a stable Debian available and that
supports the Debian menu quite well. (Only bug in my eyes it that
one has to disable
Recai Oktas wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > awk is "virtually essential": it can't be Essential: yes because
> > that would prevent removing mawk in favor of gawk, but awk is a
> > dependency of another essential package to ensure that you can use
> > basic awk functionality without having to de
Dear Sir or Madam,
Many thanks for your enquiry.
May we ask that you do three things:
1. Study in detail our PUBLISH section including the click-throughs at
www.writersworld.co.uk/publish.html as, with respect, we will not be able to
adequately advise you on your book until you have done th
> > > > Anyone intersted in answering the call?
> > > A link to actual packages files would be good...
> >
> > http://scorpius.homelinux.org/~marc/debian/
>
> Any reason why you didn't send this to the list but only to me?
> You will certainly get more useful feed back by actually posting
> the l
36 matches
Mail list logo
