Frank Küster schrieb:
>Krugaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>- Since the package will depend on X, it would be nice to have a hint in
>>> the description that there's also a command line tool. And that it
>>> produces gnuplot output, anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>The command line tool is not pa
Op do, 01-09-2005 te 13:12 -0700, schreef Steve Langasek:
> > For future ref for anyone:
>
> > Yup, it's the BSD 3 clause licence, which is fine.
> > The 4 clause isn't, as it has teh 'advertising' clause in it.
>
> Uh, no, 4 clause BSD *is* allowed in main.
I also thought 4-clause BSD was non-f
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Just tell. I had lots of trouble finding sponsors. Yet another reason I
> helped found mentors.debian.net. ;)
>
> Once your package is fixed I'll offer sponsorship. Let us know when you
> are done.
Cool, thanks! I've corrected all issues but one: I've left the word
"libr
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:01:59PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Hmmm could you please give me a hint how to use this? My steps are the
>> following:
>>
>> 1) unpack tarball
>> 2) rename dir if not compatible with debian's naming convention
>
> No need to do that. Just
Tyler Trafford wrote:
> Run dh_make -f ../ instead of just dh_make.
Thanks!
Kind regards
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:00:37PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:01:59PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> Hmmm could you please give me a hint how to use this? My steps are the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> 1) unpack tarball
> >> 2) rename dir i
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:50:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
> No, the official build tool is sbuilder (and not exactly the version
> that is released somewhere, IIRC).
Do you have more info about what has been changed to the released
sbuild package?
Not that it would be particulary import
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:52:49PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> > Jason Tan wrote on 01/09/2005 08:22:
> > > We're on the BSD license only because torsmo, conky's predecessor, was
> > > BSD. When we do Conky 2.x, which will be a compl
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:00:37PM -0400, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> - Inside this dir I put the tarball and extract it, which gives me in this
> case a second nuvola dir, since upstream packed it this way
>
> - Now I am in ~/debian/nuvola/nuvola
>
> - If I run dh_make now, it refuses (see abov
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:01:59PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hmmm could you please give me a hint how to use this? My steps are the
> following:
>
> 1) unpack tarball
> 2) rename dir if not compatible with debian's naming convention
No need to do that. Just enter the directory - no matter w
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Jason Tan wrote on 01/09/2005 08:22:
> > We're on the BSD license only because torsmo, conky's predecessor, was
> > BSD. When we do Conky 2.x, which will be a complete rewrite almost from
> > scratch, it will be GPL 2. Let me know if y
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> If you take a look at the orig-src from upstream, you get the following
>> directory-tree:
>>
>> orig-tarball:
>> `+ nuvola
>> `-+ 128x128
>>+ 64x64
>>+ ...
>
> This is supported by dpkg-source, no need to repack.
>
> You need to repack upstream sources *only* i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi Christooph
>
> Christoph Haas wrote:
>
>>I would have liked to look at it. But using the official upstream
>>tarball from icon-king-com didn't match your package:
>>
>>dpkg-source: error: file kde-icons-nuvola_1.0.orig.tar
Le Jeudi 1 Septembre 2005 17:41, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> So instead, go up one dir, do "dpkg-source -b mldonkey-2.5.28" to build the
> .dsc without running clean, and then run "pbuilder mldonkey_2.5.28-2.dsc"
Yep.
I personnaly did it with this package and it worked without problems..
Ro
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:17:01PM +0300, Alexander A. Vlasov wrote:
>> Inside an unpacked source tree;
>> I call ~/bin/mydebuild, which is simple shell script:
>> #!/bin/sh
>> pdebuild --configfile ~/.pbuilderrc \
>> --buildsourceroot fa
Hi Christooph
Christoph Haas wrote:
> I would have liked to look at it. But using the official upstream
> tarball from icon-king-com didn't match your package:
>
> dpkg-source: error: file kde-icons-nuvola_1.0.orig.tar.gz has size
> 13594245 instead of expected 13567432
Thanks for you interest
Hello,
I'm searching for a sponsor for capi2name. It's a capi isdn monitor with
a webfrontend to check for calls with your webbrowser.
* Package name: capi2name
Version : 0.6.7.9
Upstream Author : Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.capi2name.de
* Licen
Hello,
I'm preparing a package of lmms, the Linux Multimedia Studio.
ITP: #315976
Source at: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~rafl/Code/Debian/LMMS/
I'm trying to build the package in a newly created pbuilder environment.
This works for me, but for some people on #debian-mentors, the resulting
bi
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:59:42AM +0200, Benoit Mortier wrote:
>
> i have adapted samba-vscan, but this packages needs to samba source to be
> compiled. How can i achieve this ? Is there a option to depend on samba
> source for the building of the package ?
Doesn't libsmbclient-dev contain all
Alexander:
You don't show the initial commands that you use to start the build. I
usually sit in a directory where there are the *.dsc, the *.orig.tar.gz
and the *.diff.gz files. Then I invoke:
pbuilder build fityk_0.5.1-1.dsc
That starts by unpacking the chroot, then moving the source to
Hello,
I'm searching a sponsor for viruskiller, a game about viruses invading
your computer.
Your computer has been invaded! Dozens of little viruses are pouring in via
security holes in Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft
MSN Messenger and Microsoft Recycle Bin! Using yo
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:17:01PM +0300, Alexander A. Vlasov wrote:
> Inside an unpacked source tree;
> I call ~/bin/mydebuild, which is simple shell script:
> #!/bin/sh
> pdebuild --configfile ~/.pbuilderrc \
> --buildsourceroot fakeroot \
> --pbuilderroot sudo \
> $*
>
>
В Чтв, 01/09/2005 в 16:56 +0200, Sven Mueller пишет:
> It would be quite interesting to see a log of what is happening there.
> For example: How do you call pbuilder? With a .dsc file or from within
> an unpacked source tree? The way the build machines would do it (AFAIK,
> they use sbuild, not pb
"Alexander A. Vlasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Чтв, 01/09/2005 в 16:50 +0200, Frank Küster пишет:
>> "Alexander A. Vlasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > I have to build a lot of packages for personal use by myself and I
>> > expirienced a very strange problem with pbui
В Чтв, 01/09/2005 в 16:50 +0200, Frank Küster пишет:
> "Alexander A. Vlasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have to build a lot of packages for personal use by myself and I
> > expirienced a very strange problem with pbuilder:
> >
> > Some packages requires some unusual things t
Alexander A. Vlasov wrote on 01/09/2005 16:11:
> I have to build a lot of packages for personal use by myself and I
> expirienced a very strange problem with pbuilder:
This indeed seems strange.
> Some packages requires some unusual things to build, for example, dpatch
> or ocaml. Those tools are
"Alexander A. Vlasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have to build a lot of packages for personal use by myself and I
> expirienced a very strange problem with pbuilder:
>
> Some packages requires some unusual things to build, for example, dpatch
> or ocaml. Those tools are included in
Hello.
I have to build a lot of packages for personal use by myself and I
expirienced a very strange problem with pbuilder:
Some packages requires some unusual things to build, for example, dpatch
or ocaml. Those tools are included in build-dep in control file, but
actually pbuilder does some stu
Jason Tan wrote on 01/09/2005 08:22:
> We're on the BSD license only because torsmo, conky's predecessor, was
> BSD. When we do Conky 2.x, which will be a complete rewrite almost from
> scratch, it will be GPL 2. Let me know if you need any more information
> or fixes or whatnot, and I'll try to ta
Re: Martín Ferrari in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a package ready, but before filing an ITP, I would like to have
> feedback on this. Webxml is a QT editor for tomcat's web.xml files, it
> seems to work OK and can be very handy, specially when you're not
> familiar with that kind of configuration
Hi,
I have a package ready, but before filing an ITP, I would like to have
feedback on this. Webxml is a QT editor for tomcat's web.xml files, it
seems to work OK and can be very handy, specially when you're not
familiar with that kind of configuration files. The drawback is that
upstream doesn't
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:35:32PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: kde-icons-nuvola
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : David Vignoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http:/
Krugaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>- please tidy up the debian/rules file :(
> I'm sorry, but I have no clue what you want you want me to do.
Remove the unused, commented lines that dh_make wrote.
>> - you are also the upstream developer of this package. Do you use
>> Debian, or would yo
Hi!
Thanks for having a look at the package.
Frank Küster wrote:
> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Are there multiple 0.7 versions? :)
Not that I know of. Probably mixed up the tarball with one of the dev
dir. I rebuild the package with a downloaded version.
>>
>>Further annotati
34 matches
Mail list logo
